No, I wouldn't. If someone stood up for me, I wouldn't go all, "Yeah, what he said, you bully! How's it feel to be wrong?" It makes you sound like a poor-sport child. Don't kick people while they're down and all that.

The topic is about a game please let's stop fighting

You are right. I never acknowledged this guy at all. I was just responding to a different post. I am bored so I just came to check this topic to see what’s going on. Same drama as usual.

"Some of us are new to this forum"...that is where the challenge came from.

By adding that word "us", you are sort of backhand including yourself in that group, Whocrazy, and your account age is almost as high as mine, which means you've at least had the potential to have been here awhile. And I have seen you around for a long, long time, so...yeah. You're not new.

That said, your overall point is good. It just doesn't apply to you in quite that way. You, as someone who knows this place, also knew what you were getting into by first reading and then posting. That doesn't make all your responses your fault - I've been on the other side of this one, too - but it does make it at least partially your responsibility. If you can't or won't own that, and can't accept that your choice or wording made it look like you were trying to claim you were a new forum user...then yeah, that's a bit of a sticking point.

All that having been said, I have not seriously picked up this game for years.

No. I am simply saying that you have been here long enough to know what happens when you revive threads. I'm not even necessarily saying you shouldn't have done it - frankly, I don't care one way or the other - but it's kind of hard to sell the wide-eyed act when you've been here as long as you have. That's it, that's all.

Now, you can go on acting persecuted, or you can realize that your word choice made an otherwise simple request a little more tricky to parse. It's your call.

Uh, Carter? You're reporting him for spamming and going off topic in this topic, when it's not entirely clear he was or was not jesting about this game. And yet, your team as a whole has failed to realize that most of Jod's posts are spam anyway, (spam that Dglex believes is harmless, and therefore I'm assuming the rest of you are in agreement). Your motivations have never been so unclear before as they are now.
Look, be level with us. If y'all are becoming disenfranchised with this forum, either because of its toxicity or because you have your lives to handle or both, just be up front about it, and work on trying to get other people to take your place if you don't want it anymore. We all get it. Because I'm gonna be blunt here. This popping in to drop single posts then bouncing out of here and ignoring people's questions and concerns bullshit is getting really annoying really quick. Do you remember what happened to Klango? Keep doing this, and AGNet is going to go down the same way.

I'd like to react here.
There is one difference. About the Klango, most of admins don't care about software and also, two 'great' admins have destroyed one community and pissed of other people.
This was one example of one forum. Also, Klango has a bad secure things of registrations ETC. Ofcourse, Audiogames.net is I think better, than Klango. Or was? I don't know, how is with this site. I am not a developer of Audiogames.net. I've noticed from behaviour of many people (sometimes I did mistakes too), that AG.net will be soon down.
Also, I don't know, how long Klango will be on the internet and how long is Audiogames.net on the internet.
Those are My factors about It.

@65 Spoiler alert, the post wasn't written by him, had no sincerity and had nothing to do with this game. Sorry to burst your bubble. For more info, https://steamcommunity.com/discussions/ … 370884706/

Uh, Dan? Perhaps I was unclear in my original post, for which I will apologize and provide more justification.

1. See my post in the survive the wild thread wherein I warned Jod for posting the same there.
2. The Steam link from Nikola, thank you sir.
3. Most of Jods posts contain a single word, this much is true. But they are also not strictly off topic. There is a distinction, and his posts are something you can scroll past if you really want to. I have a problem with spam i.e. verb: send the same message indiscriminately to (large numbers of recipients) on the internet. Or noun: irrelevant or inappropriate messages sent on the internet to a large number of recipients. This isn't that. If it bothers you so much you maintain the right not to read it.

While this isn't the topic for it, I will say that things are going on behind the scenes. I will own that the transparency needs work. You will hear more in the coming days.

In the meantime, I feel like your characterization of me simply dropping in to do my job, a.k.a. administering and trying to make this a more pleasant place as bullshit is the fucking epitome of entitlement. Yeah, I have to (regrettably) go inactive from an unpaid position for a while to support myself and meaningfully contribute to my own livelihood and future. After my typical 60 hour workweek, twenty hours of which are high-stakes situations where I need to be on my game constantly, sometimes all I have the time for is shorter posts and popping in. This isn't lazy blind guy mad at unfair world stuff, it's working my ass off while I still can, trying to get ahead, travelling to grow my knowledge, and maintaining some semblance of a social life off the internet.

But that "popping in to drop single posts" is something, and if it weren't for the guilt that I hold on account of letting things get worse under my nose looooong after I should've taken the L, I would be long gone by now. But I do what I can for the community with the resources that I have at my disposal aka not the resources to engage in drawn out conversation, conflict, and constant criticism of the work we are or are not doing at any given time. In my book that's better than nothing. In a professional position with good income, it would be lousy performance. Here it's all I have to give.