Not just that, but the admins have been known to be most unhelpful with this kind of thing. It's like talking to a brick wall.

Let us be factual.
1.  If you go and talk to anyone on QCG, you run the risk of getting banned by the simple fact that you're interacting with someone else who might take offense to something you do.  That holds true on any game/server/platform; take your pick.
2.  If you talk to someone who isn't a friend of yours the risk is even higher.
3.  if you talk to someone who has had beaf with you in the past the risk is even higher.
4.  If 1, 2 and 3 are true, and the person in question happens to be a friend of the developer or an admin for the service, your risk is even higher.
5.  If your table is not private and you're not there specifically to use the service as it should be used, IE, gaming, the risk is even higher.
6.  If your intent in the past has been malicious by any means and you recreate, people are likely to care, making your rrisk even higher.
7.  If by reading this post you still cannot find a reason without having to have it spoon fed to you, perhaps because you sincerely don't respect that the creator of a game has the right to ban whoever they choose, or because you personally feel that you are above bans, or because you feel that facts 1 through 6 do not apply to you for some other insane reason, your risk is even higher.
8.  If you feel the need to report such a thing on a website that has previously said it cannot handle bans concerning other games, your risk is even higher.
9.  the question, and I quote, "Isn't this unfair?" suggests there is a need to agree with the topic's creator.  To not agree might result in an argument which could if unchecked by a moderator lead to a flamewar and insult hurling that is entirely unnecessary and definitely not productive to the forum.  If this kind of attitude was carried out and or was in any way present on QCG, which I believe to be true based on the fact that the topic's creator was so hesitant to give any other piece of information other than supposedly just being banned for no reason, the risk is even higher.
10.  One plus 2 plus 3 plus 4 plus 5 plus 6 plus 7plus 8 plus 9 plus seeking sympathy puts your risk at highest.
Let us please be logical and sensible when handling a discussion of this nature.  It's one thing to want to discuss an issue like this, another to simply want to make devs and their admin teams look bad.  it may be that the admins cannot speak your language and don't have time to be dealing with minor trivialities, or that you said something they misred and misinterpreted.  IN any case, rousing a forum full of gamers who deal with their platform to stand up against them and asking for thoughts on a subject that has been brought up countless times by many other individuals is quite pointless and a waste of everyone's time because there's nothing at all anyone outside of the circle of people in charge of the gameroom can do about it, regardless of oppinion.

To clear things up: You should, at first understand that the developer of QC is French, and in the entire administration team has 2 more friends who at the time didn't have very good English. This does not mean the PR has only 3 admins, as each language has their own helper team, with English at the time of this writing having only 3, though to be fair 1 or 2 can be considered active. So, Aminiel who is on here can speak reasonably good English, and 3 English helpers obviously. If you get banned, the policies were quite different a year ago and things have changed. Noone spoke about that, but the administration team of the playroom got a huge, huge improvement from how it was let's say a year or 2 ago. Usually, your first ban is not for 2 or 3 days. This does not however mean that you can send a crashword on f4 and say hey but I did it for the first time, I should get banned for just 2 days. This applies only to someone reporting you and in unclear cases. Since you got banned for 19000 days which in PR terms essentially means a forever ban, there is not that much to do. You can go to the contact page and try to defend your case, but do it only if you are apsolutely sure you weren't immature and did what I am sure you did. Writing on here wont help you much, as the only staff member on here is Aminiel, the main developer and he himself isn't really that responsible for such things.

at Posts:  4
.............

There are reasons why they don't and should not care. If you think that saying hey look i got banned but I really didn't do anything is enough, then you're very wrong. By the way, it doesn't mean that in the moment when you get banned you did something bad.

Oh yeah, and when you do contact them you should probably be transparent about your activity history, in other words, saying I got banned but didn't do nothing isn't gonna help your cause nor anyone else's. @Nocturnus pretty much summed up everything you shouldn't do when crying over a ban.

I'd have to respectfully disagree with that one Brandon. Even given Storm productions's track record, anything he does on an online game has nothing to do with what he does on here. What I mean is whether or not he caused havoc on online games has nothing to do with his activity on the forum, as long as he isn't doing the same things here. that said, the rule about not posting about an online game ban is a rule, but it's not like they're gonna ban him oriutght for it. Well, maybe so if he came out and hurled insults at the devs and anyone who stood in his way, but in his defense I don't see any of that here. He expresses irritation, sure. But this thread is honestly pretty mid compared to others we've seen. And without Abdul who used to be a recurring character i this particular game, there won't be any false accusations thrown around anymore. So as long as you keep it civil on here and when contacting Aminiel, things should be fine.

Orko, I must humbly disagree with you on your statement regarding "creating flamewars". As long as a topic is done in a respectful and professional manner I think it's actually important to bring developer faults to the table so that gamers know what games to play or rather what they should expect if they choose to play it. I don't think this topic was professional, it was just a simple statement without any "evidence" (as much evidence you can have in these situations). They shall be judged on a case to case bases. But I do support the idea of letting people know if a developer is full of shit.

Like I said, this topic is not of a productive kind, so I agree with you on that point. But I will stand by my idea that for example my complaints to Redspot admins and Sam Tupy were only informative in letting people know what they can expect, and my proof was in ... well the developer himself confirming my story but we had disagreements + there were lots of other factors involved that he did not consider.

What we can determine here is that Storm Productions was banned, else why would he create a topic with that title if he wasn't. We don't know why or anything else other than he was banned. He'll have to give us more background info before we can start weeding out ... well actually that won't happen and nothing good will come from it anyway.

I would just like to not see this kind of thing at the top of every page all the time, that'd be nice, nah mean?