Okay, so, two things:

1. Playing devil's advocate here just for a sec. An audio file doesn't actually prove anything. It might prove that Julia exists in the first place, but it technically doesn't prove that her account here actually belongs to her. Let me be clear. I think it very likely does, and I'm adhering to my own innocent-till-proven-guilty thing. I'm just saying that if we're being rational about this, accepting that Julia is real and does exist does not necessarily mean her account here is real. I have said this without listening to the YouTube video. If it turns out that said youtube video is two people talking in such a way as do disprove everything I just said, I can accept that.
2. Uh...who was involved in this video? Were they name-dropped? Were they all given a chance to consent? If not, this is serious business, ECC. I believe you may recall a user who did this just over a year ago, trying to get us to figure out the name of a woman he was in a call with, and everyone dogpiled him for it.

I'm just gonna go have a peek at this and see what I find.

Edit:
So the "call" is not actually a call, not really, not in the way that word is usually used; it is basically a stream of Manamon 1 from almost a year ago, which seems to prove that Julia is a separate person who does exist. It does not definitively prove that the account here is hers, though, since it happened almost eleven months ago and thus can't deal with current-day questions of truthfulness. It is very clearly not ECC talking to herself. Clearly any issues of name-dropping are moot as well, since in the bits I've heard, at least, nothing untoward actually happened.

Moderation:
Now, you know how I said that this video doesn't prove that Julia actually owns her account? It's true. But that really isn't the point.
It's not up to Julia to prove that this account belongs to her. It is actually up to any of the rest of you to prove that it doesn't belong to her. The burden of proof is on you folks, not on Julia and not on ECC. And right now, I'm seeing precious little evidence to that end, so I'd like the subject dropped until or unless there is more credible evidence.
To be clear: Julia is to be treated as any other new member of the forum at this point. If she breaks the rules, we will deal with it. If she says something silly, then you can deal with her the same way you'd deal with anybody else, so long as you don't break the rules in the process. But the witch-hunt about how this might just be ECC making another alt stops right here and now, until such time that you present credible evidence. Regardless of the questionable impression Julia might have left upon arriving here recently, she deserves a chance to be a part of this forum if that is what she wants, and that includes not being dogged by baseless alligations.

I would like to say a huge thank-you to both Jayde and ECC for defending my case. I'm not sure what else to say here besides that, but I do hope you will stop accusing me of being fake when I am in fact a legitimate second person in this scenario. I know Eliza's real name too, and trust me, if you know what she's been through, not just her "alters" (or at least that's what you believe them to be), if you knew that, you would know that the name Eliza is permanent for her now, and would be advised not to call her K.E if you know what's good for you.

@Jayde Understood.

For what it's worth, I'm glad this situation was dealt with quite nicely.  Jayde, thank you for doing what you do and doing it diligently.  To Cookie and Julia, I'm sorry some of our more outspoken members have gotten in the way of you two having good interactions with those of us who mean well here on this forum.  Cookie has indeed caused a fair amount of discomfort on this forum in the past, but that's hardly a reason to assume the worst on a regular basis.  If we do that we may as well just turn our backs on anyone who's ever commited any kind of offense against anyone else on this forum no matter how slight, and then what kind of forum if any would we have?  Some of our greatest contributors started off as massive troublemakers.  Some of our greatest troublemakers were originally awesome contributors.  Some are a bit of both; you never judge a book by its cover.

No @TheEvilChocolateCookie I never told you. I registered in April but forgot about it until I needed to find a way for the two of us to keep in touch, and I never put in a post to have my account unrestricted. I also remember you telling me you had an account here, plus you mention it a bunch on YouTube.

Well well, it's all right now.

@59 can I come and vertually take a giant bite out of you then become evil myself?

@haily_merry, If I'm to follow my own advice in 58, the correct answer would be that, it matters not who you are, but who you want to be. :d

Oh, erm, thanks for pointing that out, ewhwhwhwhwhwh.

eh   how are virtual parties like, never attended one.

Hello! Soo now i just saw this topic. I know that is too late but..... I hope that you are much better now. I dont know the feeling because until recenttly i didnt have any friends. But whatever you feel right now that it will pass. It will be hard but one day you will smile again. If you ever need someone to talk or just to lisen you can pm here. I check my pm . Dont be sad, be happy. I know that is easy for me to say but you can do it.