2020-09-23 22:17:38

@wing of eternity, yes, there are places in WoT you hear about by rumour, however, you get to see far more of the world than in Ice and fire, because Jordan literally deals with most of the known world in the book, especially later in the series when you get into really serious politics.

However, one thing to bare in mind is that the emphasis is different. In song of ice and fire, because hystery of noble houses and heraldry is such a concern of that world, we get a lot of that in the books, indeed even the historical books in question such as a world of ice and fire are written in universe to fulfil a love of that history.

In WoT, there are no kingdoms that have lasted thousands of years, no noble houses that can trace their lineage back to prehistory, no structures built in the dawn of time, because your literally dealing with a world recovering from an apocalypse so brutal, nobody is even sure how long it's been since the apocalypse happened, indeed this makes the rare occasions you do see things or people from the past really major events.

I'll also, say the grimness factor is different, or at least, where Martin almost delights in slaying characters and having everything as brutal as possible with rape and murder and torture as commonplace, Jordan eases off on that aspect somewhat. Not to say that he doesn't sometimes have very bad stuff happen, he certainly does, but we don't tend to lose characters or have as much naked in your face brutality in Jordan, another reason my lady prefers the series to Martin,with whom she has an onrunning love/hate relationship.

I will admit in the case of Jordan, while I wouldn't describe his stuff as fluffy or overly nice like lackey's, he does have an annoying tendency whereby characters hang around a bit too long, so where any other self-respecting badguy would slay their minions when said minions fail, in jordan said minions just hang around, fail more, connive a bit, work for different bad guys, get punished, connive some more, and continue to just be annoying as we meet even more characters until you want to say "hay dark one! just kill them already will you!" big_smile.

This is another reason imho books 6-10 tended to drag a bit too much, since characters whose stories really should have finished tended to stick around way beyond the time they felt useful, while Jordan just tended to pile on even more.

With our dreaming and singing, Ceaseless and sorrowless we! The glory about us clinging Of the glorious futures we see,
Our souls with high music ringing; O men! It must ever be
That we dwell in our dreaming and singing, A little apart from ye. (Arthur O'Shaughnessy 1873.)

2020-09-23 22:34:08

Dark, The Seanchan empire has existed, not since the breaking, but for I think at least a couple thousand years since Ardur Pendragon conquered. Also, we never learn about the islands of the seafolk or Shar, and the peoples across the waste, much beyond glimpses here and there, and what we do know is more rumor than fact. We don't even know how much more the world is since we never circumnavigate it.
For all intents and purposes we mostly focus on the western part of one continent, and that part we get to know a lot.

One thing I like is also that the forsaken aren't all the strongest from their time, although some are. Some are just teachers or scholars, or even just musicians and their motivations were more than just, "I want power for the sake of power."

thanks,
Michael

2020-09-24 00:06:31

Man, and see now Dark makes me want to try WOT again. I get the thing about stories dragging on. But I also feel like, you know, maybe that's more real you know? It's like happy endings where everything neatly wraps up, we've been conditioned to expect that by and in stories, but life rarely works like that. Similarly, I doubt even in real life criminal organizations if you have people going "sorry Timmy, you messed up, I'm blowing you away"! I mean sure that happens, but not, you know, all the time and for any mistake. I'll bet going on to work for other dudes and messing up in a different way or even the same way or whatever actually happens way more in real life.

On the other hand, we could be right back to the paranoid dagger thing. Sure, those would have been his thoughts. I don't need to hear the exact same thoughts for ten pages straight, I get that he's paranoid, I know what that's like now, we can move on, thanks. I'm also not super into politics and all. So man I just don't know. I like the Gypsies in the first book, or whatever they were called, the people looking for the song. I liked the ogre, he seemed pretty cool. I want to know more about those things. Everything else? not so much.

_____________________________
"rabbid dog  aggressive  attitude" since 3035. THE SYSTEM IS TRAP!

2020-09-24 06:35:59

Jordan's stuff is definitely lighter, as far as the good guys getting the stuffing knocked out of them, than some other stuff I could point out. Oh, some characters go through the wringer, but many just don't. Or they do, and then get a free level-up after it's done. Using that term loosely, of course, but yeah, there's definitely stuff out there way darker than WoT, and I'm okay with that.

Another good solid series to recommend is Daniel Abraham's Dagger and Coin series. It's five books, the porse is tight, the characters are well-drawn, and while there is magic in the world, it's not huge and shoved in your face. It's actually sort of subtle.

On the grimmer side of things is Brian Staveley's Unhewn Throne series. Much more brutal, closer to grimdark honestly, and with some weak characterization here and there, but it also has some excellent character-building, pretty good dialogue, plus it's full of action. And it's only a trilogy.

I have heard of another series I've yet to try, by Melissa McPhail, called A Pattern of Shadow and Light. I honestly don't know how good it is yet, but I've been meaning to take a peek.

Check out my Manamon text walkthrough at the following link:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/z8ls3rc3f4mkb … n.txt?dl=1

2020-09-24 06:41:02

@drums61999, there is a difference of emphasis here I think however.
Yes, in WoT you don't really get to see Shara or Seanchan , and obviously the sea folk travel to different lands because; well it's sort of in the name big_smile.


However, far more of WoT explores what world we do see, with all the various Kingdoms and their politics.

This is I think an authorial and stylistic difference between the two series. Martinn, following very much in the footsteps of Robert E Howard, loves the exotic and unknown, so in Game of thrones there is a hole bunch of stuff we're just meant never to know, or which is just meant to tantalise, Ashai, the Shadow lands, everything around the Jade sea such as Yi Ta, Narthos, Sothoris, etc.

contrast that list to the very few places like Shara we don't hear about in WoT.


Again, I'd say this is just a difference in Emphasis, in WoT, the mystery comes both from the age of legends and all we don't know, and as you said yourself, a lot of the characters, good bad, uggly etc, and how they will react to things.

Take the end of the gathering storm, which is one of the most truly fantastic moments I've read in a fantasy series, and yet involves no battle, no attacks, no war, just the main character coming to a more peaceful understanding with himself.

@khomus, in WoT, it's not so much a case of lack of happy endings, it's more that you get so many characters who take focus that the story just grinds to a halt, especially with certain plotlines that aren't advancing the main plot, and as I said, characters you really want to exit the series who just don't.

Then again, when my lady reread the series recently she actually told me that she found books 6-10 better than she remembered, though admitedly she's a gigantic WoT fan girl as I said big_smile.

Interestingly enough khomus, my lady will tell you she hates politics, she doesn't care for factions or backstabbing or anything of the sort (another reason she does not like Martin), yet she adores the wheel of time.

eye of the world is also a little rougher and slightly different in Empahsis than some of the other books, both because we haven't quite met some major characters and factions (notably the ais Sidai), and because in much of it Jordan was quite consciously doing a nod to Tolkien and the "farm boy leaves home to save the world" sort of architypal fantasy, even though WoT, though on the face of it does actually feature a hero who does grow up on a farm and  is destined to save the world is anything but that.

I'd say myself, read the first two books then decide.

Oh, but Loyal the Ogier is awesome, again, one of my issues in books 6-10 is how we sort of lost him as a character, or rather, he just sort of gets sent off on a mission and we don't see much of him which was a shame.

Though khomus, I can say if you like the Tinkers, those gypsies you mention, yee gods you have some surprises in store if you continue with the series big_smile.

With our dreaming and singing, Ceaseless and sorrowless we! The glory about us clinging Of the glorious futures we see,
Our souls with high music ringing; O men! It must ever be
That we dwell in our dreaming and singing, A little apart from ye. (Arthur O'Shaughnessy 1873.)

2020-09-24 08:20:43

Would actually argue that the first three books are more definitive of WoT than just the first two. Once you hit book 4, the series really starts to spread out and settle down and get comfy. Everyone goes haring off every which way, and stuff gets huge. For this reason, The Shadow Rising is one of my favourite books in the series. Though that moment in The Gathering Storm that Dark mentioned is quite a good one, and kind of ends the "Emo Rand" thing that had been going on for awhile. There are many good reasons why, even though Wheel of Time has many issues, it's still one of my all-time favourite comfort reads. If I'm sick in bed, for instance, I'll often chuck one of those books on and just doze. If I'm playing a browser-based game and grinding like mad, same deal. It's a series I will probably reread off and on for years, so in that sense, Dark, your lady and I would get along famously.

Check out my Manamon text walkthrough at the following link:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/z8ls3rc3f4mkb … n.txt?dl=1

2020-09-24 08:28:47

I was a little bit disapointed of Staveley. The characters were all a little bit to straight caught in their stenciledness. You were allways able to say who will turn out good or evil. special in cases of the bad guys. This killed a lot of my interest in the first book cause it was so very predictable.
But i agree absolutely with Daniel Abraham and have to mention his first books about a chinese-influenced world.
It has a very interesting concept of magic and a lot of different acting characters too.

2020-09-24 09:18:09 (edited by wing of eternity 2020-09-24 09:20:09)

well in asoiaf we have something similar called the age of heroes, where we have character like simion the blind knight, and such. Of course, there are misteryes in asoiaf like the relation between the white walkers and the children of the forest, and not just that , but even many of the children's real power is unknown, bran being the only one who can comunicate with them in centuryes.

We also had the things, with dragons, but in this regard we have many dragons names, and such so that part was a bit documented. now, that you mentioned the breaking the doom of valyria came to mind, they are quite similar in a way accepting the fact the valeria turned to dust after the doom. may be as you sad , dark, in WoT the other continent is mentioned but not expanded upon.

Martin did suggest that he wanted to make something like a inuniverse history, in order to be more realistic as our history there are some unknown things, which is perfectly fine. it makes the thing much harder, and don't forget that there are also many speculations by fans. is there such intrest for WoT is well?
I find this comparqason very interesting indeed.

eddit: Oftopic  dark, but how did you arive in the book of records?

---
"A good ruler gives the goblet to his servants. He never drinks from it himself. The servants need his glory. He does not cary the flame alone.
For a spark does not lit the flame, but the spirit holds it in place. Forgeting that leads one to destruction.
(Enhemodius before the Altar of the Broken)"

2020-09-24 09:20:19

slight
Unhewn Throne
spoilers

Personally, I thought Caden was the least interesting of the three characters overall, but I thought that his brother and sister were treated fairly well, particularly Adare after book 2. You can clearly see how each believes, from their own position, that they're doing right, and you can see from the outside how each is going to work at cross-purposes to the others without fully realizing it. I also like many of the villains and side characters. Most of them are not one-dimensional. Frankly, only the first book is flatter, character-wise; I think the second and third did an excellent job building these folks up.

Abraham, though, is in an entirely different class. I was actually rooting for the villain for awhile early on, and was sick to death of Cithrin until she got her head on straight. Marcus is less than amazing, but I'm okay with that. In fact, I see it as an inversion of the trope, where the noble hero type sort of gets all the spotlight, and this time it doesn't quite go that way.

Check out my Manamon text walkthrough at the following link:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/z8ls3rc3f4mkb … n.txt?dl=1

2020-09-24 09:34:08

@Wing of eternity, short answer, nope, the age of legends and age of heroes are entirely %100 different concepts and are treated differently in their respective series

In song of ice and fire, you say for example that thing ex, like the forest children is mysterious or unknown, but these are things we actually see in the series and which might be explained (Martin himself has confirmed that winds of winter will go further north than any other book we've seen so far).

in WoT however, the age of legends is literally unknown to most people, there are still devices kicking around that people use with the power, but nobody is sure how they work, indeed it's one major point in the series that while we do see some people from the age of legends, they tend to regard the world around them as a mess of ignorant savages (though admittedly, since they're usually completely evil, this isn't so surprising).

The doom of Valeria in song of ice and fire is also not comparable, since westerosi history started after that, where as in WoT the breaking really shattered the world, including making all male channelers I.e not a small part of the entire male population insane!

Also, note that another major issue in WoT, is the idea of rebirth, reincarnation and things repeating, which becomes both a theme in the series itself, and it's cosmology, where as Song of ice and fire doesn't tend to be quite that extreme with it's metaphysics, since Martin was more concerned with history, than philosophy, indeed in very early draughts Ice and fire had no magic whatsoever and was essentially an alternative history telling of the wars of the roses with Stark and Lanister replacing York and Lancaster.

With our dreaming and singing, Ceaseless and sorrowless we! The glory about us clinging Of the glorious futures we see,
Our souls with high music ringing; O men! It must ever be
That we dwell in our dreaming and singing, A little apart from ye. (Arthur O'Shaughnessy 1873.)

2020-09-24 10:14:31

@Jayde: Ya, you are wright.
but to a large extent I didn't care cause Staveley made it clear very quickly how he deals with the conclusions of all good/bad/relationship. And that was too much simple salvatore style for me.
In the end the story heroes  were simply better in kill
Dont get me wrong. I enjoyed the three books. But they are far from becoming a favorite in my list.

Unfortunately the dagger and the coin series is not yet fully translated here in germany.

2020-09-24 11:08:08

woooow! now I found a better analogy
the one power is similar to the force
the jedi are close to Aes Sedai, and as in sw the force has light and dark, and in WoT the one power is split in saidin which corrupts like the darkside of the force. sedai , and , the oonly thing is that the force soesn't have male and female halfs, but the darkside it's like a taint of seidin.

---
"A good ruler gives the goblet to his servants. He never drinks from it himself. The servants need his glory. He does not cary the flame alone.
For a spark does not lit the flame, but the spirit holds it in place. Forgeting that leads one to destruction.
(Enhemodius before the Altar of the Broken)"

2020-09-24 11:15:42

Not...not quite, no.

Saidin and Saidar are literally two halves of the same source. Neither is inherently good nor evil, but due to a cataclysm, Saidin was tainted, such that it will eventually drive anyone who uses it insane and ultimately will kill them.
Saidin is characterized as having to constantly fight against a raging river. You push and prod and shove and wrestle it into the weaves you want, and use it by mastering it.
Saidar, by contrast, must be embraced. Those using Saidar are taught to surrender to it, since there is no fighting against Saidar; it is simply too strong. You allow it to fill you, then channel it into the weaves you want.
A woman channelling Saidin would get herself destroyed. A man channelling Saidar would likewise get himself destroyed.
It is a bit simplistic, at its core, but within the series it works fairly well.
Robert Jordan definitely had some long-standing stereotypes he employed, especially with women, that I'm not super fond of. Then again, some of his female characters kick serious ass.

Check out my Manamon text walkthrough at the following link:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/z8ls3rc3f4mkb … n.txt?dl=1

2020-09-24 11:27:21

And in addition, the Aes Sedai,  also have different color fractions specialisations that have completely different personal value systems.
Sure, they have nothing to do with  Saidin  itself, but they still differ in their capabilities.

2020-09-24 12:08:03

I can also recommend Steven Erikson's Malazan Book of the Fallen series.
Although I'm only at book 4, it's quite interesting, with a complex magic system.
There are grimm and dark elements in it

Kinda Spoilers for Memory of Ice:
So there is this religious fanatic nation who does some messed up things.
1 They eat the dead.
2. A group of their women find and rape dying soldiers on the battlefield creating the Children of the Dead seed.

It's a bit hard to get into, when you read the first book, you are kinda thrown into the deepend with all the names and concepts, but I think the series is quite interesting.

2020-09-24 17:24:31

Jayde, A Pattern of Shadow and Light is probably the best series I have read. Great characters, great magic system, lots of action. She is also very responsive to her readers.

thanks,
Michael

2020-09-24 18:38:21

Reading this topic is also making me want to reread WoT! I read the series once starting after knife of dreams was released, I think I was about 10 when I started, and finished it as books came out. I loved it.

Prier practice and preparation prevents piss poor performance!

2020-09-24 20:14:30 (edited by Dark 2020-09-24 20:15:11)

@Berenion, I've heard a lot of good things about Stephen Ericson. Fantasybookreview.co.uk list his series as in the top ten fantasy series of all time.
I'm always slightly put off by the length of the books, since these days as I said, in a lot of ways I prefer shorter series, but at some point I should just bite the proverbial bullet and give them a go, since I certainly don't mind series that give you a complex world to explore and expect you to catch up later.



@Wing of iturnity, nope, the one power is nothing like the force.
Neither saidin, nor Saidar, are good or evil.
Saidin, the male half of the source was tainted by the dark one, which corrupts men who use it, but this is like water with an oil slick, there's nothing wrong with the water itself, it's the oil slick on the water that makes it wrong to drink.

it is correct that Saidin and Saidar work differently, with Saidar requiring women who channel to open themselves to a power and surrender to it, like a flower bud opening to the sun, and men to leap into Saidin like diving into a river of ice and fire and use their strength to fight and control it.

Women also tend to be stronger in water and air weeves while men tend to be stronger in earth and fire, though this is not absolute (Egween for example is unusually strong in Earth).

I'll confess, this inherent Freudian nature to the universe is something that I do not like in the series, though to Jordan's credit he also shows clearly that the two halves of the source work best when used in collaboration, and also that both Saidin and Saidar can achieve a variety of results, and a woman using Saidar is just as capable of blowing the bejaggers out of things with blasts of lightning or fire, as a man is able to use Saidin to heal, a fact which pleasantly surprised me, since I did assume (wrongly), that WoT would be a series where women all got the fluffy healing magic and men got the big blasty magic.

In general, while I don't like the hole Women get power by surrendering, men get power by fighting thing, at the same time, Jordan is too good a writer to let him straight jacket it too much, indeed this is another respect where the One power and the force are %100 different, since the starwars films at least always make it a case of the cool, rational virtuous light side vs the angry emotional hateful dark side.

As to the Ais Sidai, they are like the Jedi in as much as they are an unaffiliated politically powerful faction free to do their own thingg who gain their power through their use of what is essentially magic, and who have their own centuries of tradition and underlying assumptions. however, the Ais Sidai are also split into a variety of different coloured Ajas each with their own personality, motivations and goals, indeed a fun game I often play with my lady is to try and guess the Ajas of people we know.

My lady as I said, is absolutely the quintessential green, she did have ideas of being a yellow because she liked the idea of healing, but she just doesn't have the spiky yellow personality, something which Jordan got absolutely write, me having met a lot of medics in my time.

Actually the only aja I think he got really wrong was the white Aja, since all of the logicians I've met tend to be the complete opposite of cool, rational and above emotions, and are more likely to threaten to come to blows about whether linguistic predicates in sentences are the same as existential properties in an objectless metaphysical system, or whether time has tenses big_smile.

With our dreaming and singing, Ceaseless and sorrowless we! The glory about us clinging Of the glorious futures we see,
Our souls with high music ringing; O men! It must ever be
That we dwell in our dreaming and singing, A little apart from ye. (Arthur O'Shaughnessy 1873.)

2020-09-24 21:43:08 (edited by wing of eternity 2020-09-24 21:43:49)

do you guys know of any books where someone has transcended his or her humanity/existence, and become imortal or something like that? some one who has passed the concerns of mortal beings. Is there a book or a series with such a character?
it doesn't matter if it is sc-fi or fantasy.

---
"A good ruler gives the goblet to his servants. He never drinks from it himself. The servants need his glory. He does not cary the flame alone.
For a spark does not lit the flame, but the spirit holds it in place. Forgeting that leads one to destruction.
(Enhemodius before the Altar of the Broken)"

2020-09-24 22:24:03

I mean there are lots of litrpg books like that, where people basically become dungeons in video games. I get the feeling that isn't what you're looking for but if it is, here are a couple. not sure about spelling, but should be close ish.
divine dungeon series by dakota crout
bone dungeon, by Johnathan Smith? I think

Prier practice and preparation prevents piss poor performance!

2020-09-24 22:58:06

A Pattern of Shadow and Light has ways to become immortal.

The general problem, unless the author is very careful, is that immortals generally end up with a superman complex.

thanks,
Michael

2020-09-24 23:00:15

OK, let's assume I'm going to plunge back into WOT. Am I starting with Eye, or that prequel novel?

It's cool to read all of this because for me, I'm a compulsive re-reader. I'm also dumb. It took quite a few re-reads of Eddings to hit the stuff I mentioned way back. I should add, I don't have  a problem with them, as such. Eddings is fun enough, I just think it detracts a bit when you realize he's essentially telling the same story over and over and over again. But I mean, I've read all the Conan stories a few times, no problem. I sort of figure hey, whatever problematic stuff is going on, that's how people were back then, or at least, that's how the author wanted the characters to be.

Stories are weird for me. They need to grab me, and that's about it. Everybody was super jazzed about the Pern stories. I started reading one, and I just got to the middle and went, man I do not care about these people or what's going on with them. I did read all of Eye, so that's something. That's what makes me kind of want to get back into it. On the other hand, I read all of Harry Potter and I'm just going, OK, read that, kind of fun, don't need to go back to it. But I love The Book of Three series, so go figure.

So some of the stuff you're talking about like, oh you know this character's going to be the good guy or whatever, eh, doesn't bother me much. I think that's because it's another story trope that you need ambiguous people, you know? They're part of life too, obviously. But I think that, by and large, most of the people you meet, you probably know whether they're decent people or assholes fairly quickly. So it doesn't really bother me to have characters conform to those types unless it just gets ridiculous.

_____________________________
"rabbid dog  aggressive  attitude" since 3035. THE SYSTEM IS TRAP!

2020-09-24 23:19:57

It's tricky. I'd personally read New Spring, the prequel, about halfway through the series.
It takes place a couple of decades before Eye of the World, but it also sort of tosses you into the deep end a bit, assuming you know a bunch about the Aes Sedai and the various Ajahs and stuff. I feel like the series starts out a certain way, and screwing with that may hurt.
But I'd say the only -bad place to read New Spring is after book 11. At that point, the tone shift is jarring, the plot is propelling itself, and reading New Spring will seem like an unwanted interjection. Alternatively, you can simply not read it at all, because most of what's there is covered in other ways through the main plot, if in far, far less detail.

Check out my Manamon text walkthrough at the following link:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/z8ls3rc3f4mkb … n.txt?dl=1

2020-09-25 00:28:47

Hi everyone. I've recently started reading fantasy books, and I've really liked the re-incarnation theme. (guy gets killed and wakes up in a new body with powers and etc). Any recommendations on good books like that?
one series I'm reading is the bad  guys series by eric ugland. It's LITRPG fantasy, and It's been fun up to now that I've read three books

:)

2020-09-25 07:39:28 (edited by Dark 2020-09-25 07:45:09)

@khomus, as regards WoT, I'd suggest starting with eye of the world and only reading new spring around book 5 or so. It's well worth reading, indeed it was reading new spring in the legends collection that first got my lady into the series, but it isn't the easiest place to start, plus Jordan was fairly good at introducing the world slowly.

As I said in This article, the problem I find in formulaeic writing is predictability killing story tension. If you know  that a certain character is always safe because they are a main character, or that the good guys are going to get out of a situation because they're the good guys, then tension has gone out of the window.

Eddings, even though he was writing very much in the standard good guys heroes journey mold, did have a very nice habit of having character who did not necessarily know they were going to get out of a given situation, so you could empathise with what they were feeling in that situation. while Even though conan basically is a massive succeedinator who wins at everything, Robert E Howard had a gift for language and poetry that shines through (Indeed I love several of his poems), though in Conan particularly, the rants about women needing to be submissive and obedient (along with the amount of slave girls), and about how white people are  unquestionably superior, do make me wince a lot, since the books are unquestionably preachy, and what they are preaching in places is an extremely repellent mindset, albeit one with a historical context (the books are nearly 100 years old after all).

this is why, though I've read the odd individual conan story, I can't take too many of them at once, and much prefer to stick to Howard's poetry.

Eddings tended to avoid as much preaching in his main series even if he did have certain assumptions about men and women that grate on occasion, though in certain of his prequal novels (especially Polgara the sorceress), the times when we're openly told about the big dumb brutish men being overseen by the strident cunning little women, it did get a bit urcsome.

Then again with any author, modern ones included, I'd much rather read a good story than just get an opinion preached to me, and much rather have complex 3 dimensional characters than cardboard props for the author's opinions.

As to Pern, well McCaffery is very hit and miss, when she's on she's on, when she's off she isn't. I'm doing a slow reread of her dragon riders series putting the reviews on fantasybookreview.co.uk. I tend to find ironically that those books which are character focused, like the harper hall trilogy, tend to be much more fun than those which try to be political stories, like the main series.

McCaffery also  suffer rather badly from a kind of idealism found to a lesser extent in authors like Mercedes lackey, where you hear about someone doing something bad, the good guys get together, and the person doing the bad thing is just politically talked out of it before you actually see the bad thing happen, or likewise, on the rare occasions you see something bad happen to someone, well usually they go and tell the authorities who are unquestionably good, and someone puts a stop to it.

it's actually sort of refreshing, MCCaffery has problems like mismanagement, abuse of power and bullying dealt with in the way that we would hope they could be dealt with in reality, rather than what actually happens big_smile.

This unfortunately makes a lot of her books less than tense to read, and means she's generally better when dealing with individual character experiences, hence why the harper hall trilogy, which are basically just the story of one girl's attempts to be accepted as a musician in the heavily sexist hidebound medieval culture of pern, actually work far better than when she's trying to show political plots or power plays.


As to the immortality question, mostly I've seen that occur in science fiction or urban fantasy rather than in epic WoT style fantasy myself, although it's a question even Tolkien deals with with the elves.

With our dreaming and singing, Ceaseless and sorrowless we! The glory about us clinging Of the glorious futures we see,
Our souls with high music ringing; O men! It must ever be
That we dwell in our dreaming and singing, A little apart from ye. (Arthur O'Shaughnessy 1873.)