2018-07-30 21:00:24

Weird. ESET NOD32 works fine for me. It even says it works well with JAWS now. I can't say how well it works with NVDA though.

2018-07-30 21:48:10

It works horribly with NVDA. I've tried it. tongue

"On two occasions I have been asked [by members of Parliament!]: 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out ?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question."    — Charles Babbage.
My Github

2018-07-30 22:18:45

That is just so wrong that Microsoft still wins the accessibility contest when it comes to anti virus software.

2018-07-30 22:45:54

I completely agree with you there, Orko. It is incredibly sad.

And, yeah, Eset doesn't play well with NVDA at all. I had a password set on mine so that you could only activate the advanced settings upon entering it. That dialog wasn't accessible with NVDA. So, of course I couldn't uninstall it either, because you needed to enter the password, and I had to format my computer.

The glass is neither half empty nor half full. It's just holding half the amount it can potentially hold.

2018-07-31 00:29:10

To be honest, there's nothing wrong with Microsoft winning the accessibility contest, what is wrong is that they seem to be the only ones even trying.

Avast used to be my favorite, but starting with version 6 they seemed to be paying more attention to how it looked than to actually doing its job. I believe that that was when it started becoming inaccessible but can't say for sure as that was before I lost my vision.

Add to that that at version 6 they started loading it down with a bunch of unrelated features that did nothing towards detecting and removing viruses. Now I hear it's mostly bloatware that doesn't rate as highly as it used to in virus detection tests.

2018-07-31 16:12:36 (edited by Ghost 2018-07-31 16:13:05)

hi,
Though microsoft is significantly improving defender, it is still far from the best in detection and performance. The Msmpeng.exe process has a memory leak, which causes it to grow it's memory usage more and more and more the longer you use your pc. It was once using over 180 mb when my pc was idle for a couple days. Also, microsoft lags when adding industry standard features. For instance, cloud based protection and detection was only added in the 1607 update. Seriously! Avira added that feature to the free version in 2013. Seriously cloud is a very critical feature. Like many, I was forced to switch to defender in jan 2018 after avira's crappy new interface failed all of my atempts to use it with nvda.
The fact that we have to choose antiviruses based on their accessibility instead of their protection is sad.

A learning experience is one of those things that say, "You know that thing you just did? Don't do that."

2018-07-31 16:54:15

What exactly do you mean by Cloud based protection?

From the day they introduced Security Essentials back in the Windows 7 era, way before 2013, you had the option to join MAPS, Microsoft Active Protection Service, a cloud based database of information about whether a new unclassified detection is a threat or not, plus you have the option to update the signature file prior to any scan. Other than moving the detection engine to the cloud, I don't see how you can be more cloud based than that and still protect the local system.

I will agree that MSE's, or Defender's detection capabilities aren't the best, yet I find that along side smart browsing practices, it is adequate.

No anti virus, no matter how good, can provide 100% protection, and if you go browsing in risky areas like pirate or warez sites, or porn sites, then you are simply taking your chances regardless of how good your virus protection is.

Remember, like terrorists, virus writers only have to be right once, while anti virus software has to be right all of the time.

2018-07-31 18:09:42

I will probably catch some heat for this, but I am very happy using Windows defender. But as many people have stated before, it all depends on what exactly you are looking for. I have also used Avast until it became unaccesible a few years ago, but it used to bbe a pretty solid antivirus program.

Ask, and you will receive.
Seek, and you will find.
Knock, And the door will be opened for you
Mat. 7:7

2018-07-31 19:56:46

Based on a comparison on Microsoft's web site, Windows Defender is a more advanced version of Security Essentials which is weird because back in the Windows XP through 8.1 era, Security Essentials was a more advanced version of Windows Defender.

Are you confused yet? (shrugs)

2018-07-31 20:51:54

To be honest I am a bit angry with this to.
The best antivirus is not the most secure, its the most accessible.
No, scratch that fucking crap!
Msse is a fucking piece of shit, and probably windows defender is to, I don't care or wouldn't care if it was the best protection, its crap!
But between all the false positives on bgt games and the like and such its the only one that actually works on a semi reliable fashion.
Msse is the best antivirus because we can use it.
How about we take out best and add only.
Msse is the only antivirus with an interface that doesn't suck.
Oh wait, its crap by default because the interface is to basic.
I started in windows 95 with mcafee 4.0 and it was fine.
Then norton 1998, 2000, and up to 2003 and bloated that it was it had a lot going for it especially with systemworks, disk docter, the reg fixer, win doctor, the tips, the defrag, the security, the descriptive texts, and the lot.
True it was a memmory hog but I was happy for that.
Then along came avg and for a while that was fine.
Others had issues with avira, avast I could have gone to but they had captchas on downloads and I said no to that.
Suddenly everyone wants cash, I don't mind that, but addware with programs, unwanted programs that may be malware well.
Lets see, msse, doesn't have any of that but I am actually pissed at this, we need a choice, the blind don't have a choice.
The best antivirus is msse because we can use it, its the only fucking antivirus we have.
I want norton back, I want my advanced interfaces back, I want choice in what I use but I don't really have that.
Look at ccleaner, I have to use portable because of silly choices avast has made with that, monitering, running at startup and not honoring settings and the interface is inaccessible junk at least the checkbox panel is.
I am seriously wandering at this point if I should have an antivirus for scanning downloaded files mainly maybe something that runs and just does when I need to and forget the residant protection, its nothing bar trouble in my view.
I have to exclude so many of my programs I may as well not bother at all with antivirus or malware or anything.
Lets see, all blind games could be a virus, virtual recorder could be a virus, a few installers and backups could be a virus.
I have antivirus check in gmail.
The only time the av program could be good is with downloads now days.
And even then I don't have it scan archives in case it finds something it doesn't like.
Sophos is a nice idea but the false positives well damn.
What we really need is an antivirus which has a list of things one can exclude and export for others, that way we could exclude the bgt games, and other games, and export the list about for those of us to use.
I am excluding backup drives, which means I could catch something if I plug a friends drive in the system but if I don't a lot of my stuff will be misidentified.
It never used to be that way.
Antivirus used to find real viruses!
Antimalware used to find real malware.
Malwarebytes finds the same bgt files as issues I have had antimalware programs find certain registry keys etc as a problem, its laughable, with so many security breaches that the software we as users now need to work with is abismal it didn't use to be like this.
From 1995 through 2002 it actually was decent, even after the norton thing you still could get decent software up to and including 2010, after that things went boom.
Now it seems I spend time trying to fix issues caused by antivirus software.
I had a system I was working on for a friend, it was nice, but my friend got a virus.
She got a tech to load all sorts of things in to the system.
It took me 3 days to fix it.
2 hours removing all the security software.
2 days deleting junk files, and 1 day fixing system damage caused by said software.
And I was lucky, I got a system once so full of extras I spent a bit of time reformatting it, then I had to change all the passwords online for various things it had flagged and had to ask ms to not have me to rebuy windows and office, in 1998, this started with norton, in 2008 every other fucker joined in!

2018-07-31 23:39:59

Yeah, I remember when both McAfee, and Norton before Symantec bought them, had the best anti virus software. But over time that changed.

Now a days, McAfee and Symantec put so much unrelated crap, including adware to promote their products, in their anti virus software, that I'd refuse to use it, even if it was the best and most accessible anti virus software available.

Not to mention that it is damn near impossible to remove their software once it is installed on your system. It's actually easier to remove a virus without any removal tools than it is to remove their software.

2018-08-01 00:07:31

tell me about it.  my computer came with a mcafee trial and I can't get the thing off.  luckily I've managed to get defender to work independently.  It's very sad that it's pretty much the only accessible service though still.

2018-08-01 00:28:01

Yeah, it seems that all these anti virus vendors are more concerned with filling their software with eye candy than with accurate  and effective virus detection and removal.

2018-08-01 02:07:49

My machine also came with McAfee, but I was able to uninstall it normally. I wonder if it depends on what version you end up with.

2018-08-01 02:26:38

Who knows, maybe it depends on how long it's been installed, the longer it's there, the harder it is to get rid of. A new machine would be like uninstalling it right after installing it, so it would have been there for a very short time.

Just guessing.

2018-08-01 13:20:32 (edited by grryfindore 2018-08-01 13:21:41)

Hi,
very unlikely, its probably to do with the version.
and heh, I agree with the comment that the antiviruses themselves are bloody harder to get rid of than actual viruses!

I am still wondering at the person who posted about bit defender,though. whether its accessible at all? even if a little. I'd take dealing with exclusions and reading the notifications if nothing else at this point lol.

It truely does run as if its not there  most of the times, its just when it doesn't and the inaccessible notifications that used to come up at such times that made me get rid of it.
Grryf

Of all sad words of tongue or pen, the saddest are these, ‘It might have been.
Follow me on twitter

2018-08-01 14:00:57

Windows defender security center shipped with windows10 1709 or above is the best. Although it's beyond me why it detects the games I download as viruses... I simply have to go and allow the severe-level trojans detected. Otherwise it's the best one out there, with ransomware protection in build.

2018-08-01 14:12:56

hi orko,
Defender in 1607 added cloud based detection and scanning, which is different than maps. Windows defender can check files in the cloud, and decide if it is malware or not. This blog post describes how it works.
https://cloudblogs.microsoft.com/micros … n-malware/

A learning experience is one of those things that say, "You know that thing you just did? Don't do that."

2018-08-01 17:44:04

So in other words, it can tell you if a file you are about to download is infected before you download it?

2018-08-02 17:54:12

more than that, and more importantly, it can catagorize never before seen files as malware, based on cloud analyses.

A learning experience is one of those things that say, "You know that thing you just did? Don't do that."

2018-08-02 18:28:20

Well, I'm stuck with MSE until I decide to give up Windows 7, and I don't see that happening any time soon.