@Blind angel 444, I don't know, but the Start button might be a good place to... start.

This is the first time I have ever seen a survey like that. @4 I agree.

So I got curious and went through it myself.
I disagree with those seeking compensation, as I completed it with enough time that i didn't feel particuularly inconvenienced by it. I did think the quality was somewhat lacking though, especially for a university project.

To answer I believe post 2, WCAG is Web Content Accessibility Guidelines, EN is english and PL possibly Polish?

Considering time frames on my own projects, this survey rather comes across as a last minute "oh crap I have a report due in a week" kind of job.

I'm not asking for much, but I don't think it sets good precedent for disabled people to be expected to give up their unique knowledge and time for free out of a social good obligation, especially when dealing with a company or school who can afford to treat you like a normal research participant.  It makes people think we're okay with that by default.
Talking to researchers who do give compensation, they are quite adamant that this is wrong, even more so than me for instance.
If it's a high school or community college student, or a non profit startup, or  a simple survey which has an obvious positive effect on our entire community like Webaim, it's different for me.
The only negative I see is that this can restrict the survey to participants within the country, but do to research participant rights laws this often happens anyway.

I helped.

This survey has been prepared by a polish university student. I helped out a bit to ensure everything is alright. Compensation for this kind of research just isn't a thing here. Our universities are fully state-owned and free for polish citizens, so they definitely couldn't afford that. At a PHD level, maybe, just maybe, but not earlier.

I suggested making an English version of this survey to get a wider set of perspectives, but I had no idea how it would come across in the international community.

All the issues raised here will be communicated back to the person in charge, so thanks for the feedback for those who participated. If there are any specific things you wish were improved, feel free to post them.

Maybe it's just me, but I noped out as soon as it asked what disabilities I have. I get it, research study, but I don't want to put that sort of intimate detail out there for a whole university to see especially in another country, because honestly, being blunt, I don't know who will see the information. Okay there's no name, but...still. Having that as the very first question left a bad taste in my mouth, and I figured putting I'm not disclosing that'd skew the results a bit.

I don't care about compensation or not, as said, that comes off as super super entitled wanting compensation when people have pointed out how Polish universities work differently to say US or UK universities.

EDIT: Okay to clarify, @1. Don't get me wrong. I get the idea behind the first two questions but I feel like instead of asking what disability/screenrreader somebody's using, there's an, IMO, better way to word it, give a list of commonly used OSes/devices and an other box for example...

Windows/Narrator
Windows/Jaws
Windows/NVDA
Mac OS/Voiceover
Talkback/Android
Voiceover/Iphone or ipad
Other

Other text box here

That's how I'd personally have handled it, I'm still iffy on the whole what disabilities does a respondent have being the very first question, again, maybe it's just me but that leaves a bad impression right away

I took the servey. Well, as I deal with accessibility issues most of the time I go to sites that run on small and very small businesses that don't really care about accessibility, I thought why not? I don't usually have much time to spare, but today I had some, so I did it.
In stead of talking about compensations and such, let's talk about the servey itself. What did you struggle with? Which of those things you saw there you recognise in the real life day to day web browsing, somewhere, on some websites? Which ones hit pretty close to bone, by which I mean that it happens actually on most websites and web apps, even electron ones(looking at you discord)?
Personally, I liked the one with the timer, since I got that kind of experience my self, not that spammy, but still. As a bonus, it annoyed the hell out of me, what about you guys?
Next one, the forms, both the one with the email, password and country field, as well as the one with the radio buttons, the select box, and the weird enough multy select dropdown things.
And don't even get me started on the videos with no sound, as well as those grafs with the label below the image itself. I mean, I never saw that anywhere, who the hell does that anymore, since the existance of the alt attribute?

@bgt lover, A massive pet peeve of mine is when websites neglect to put any form of navigational elements on their pages. This includes headings, properly-formatted lists (AKA, actually rapping lists in <ol> or <ul>), and landmarks. I hate, hate, HATE websites that do this, and I didn't skip a heartbeat when mentioning it in the survey. I also indicated massive issues with the video with no sound, and how I could only get to the player by tabbing to it. The images that weren't formatted as images was also weird to me, in that, I couldn't press G to navigate between them. Likewise, I mentioned the inaccessibility of the form elements. I found it really annoying when NVDA announced the state of the timer whenever its value changed. Serious distraction.

I also found it slightly weird how each  test was separated from its related feedback section. Not a big deal, just...
Edit: I have also just discovered, it seems to be entirely possible to waltz through the questionnaire without answering any questions at all. I mean come on. At least make the required feedback fields... required.
Edit 2: Some of the questions, anyway.

I don't feel it's entitled to ask for some compensation in this kind of study, but knowing what I do now about Polish universities, it's more understandable.
I tend to only do uncompensated surveys if they are done well (prier research done rather than lots of open ended questions or uneducated assumptions) and they have a decent chance of actually being published in a paper or directing policy.
I started making that choice after dealing with just too many not so great surveys and not having as much time to spend on it thanks to school.  But I'll try this one out as it seems interesting and well researched.