Hi.

I'm not offended by this at all but the title probably won't get you the result you want.

The most essential words from the original post that speak for themselves:
blinktards
blastards
bliques
isis

That is all.

Those two parts of the post, though not directly quoted, said all I needed to know to not take this person seriously... at all.

This guy is making me kringe.
Sometimes people should think before they post...

The title was sarcastic. The isis thing. Well i can see why you would be angry plus i wasnt speakinng about this forum only, but the blind comunity
As for the isis thing, at the end of the day they all unite to do a comon purpose. Am i telling you to walk down your streets and wack people with your canes? No. I was saying we should unite to achieve our common goal of integrating with society as a whole.

A Wild Edgy MCEdgerson Appears!
Don't scare the li'le fella now... But look at that li'le trench coat! Dawwwwww.

@14, i am not mason armstrong. Quote all you want. You can all just read a bit of my post and all future posts pickin the bad all you want. #2 gets it.

Looking at a mirror cross? Anyhow, i realise that you guys dont understand me now, and never will. Its there for the mods to see and im not even gonna fight. Maybe I used a bad choice of words maybe you guys have anomosity to me. I give up, good night

@Lawrence_McSu: Getting us to unite as one group, in and of itself, could be a very noble thing. But ways to drop your credibility and thus denoblize your call to action include, but are not limited to:
1. Asinine name-calling tactics (seriously, need I say more?)
2. That last group you name-checked? Yeah, think you're a know it all to the point you can associate your message, indirectly of course, to a purely evil group, in the name of a friggin call to action? Nope, doesn't work and is just overall an extreme dick move.
Oh, yeah, and taking a dig at Mason when he isn't even here to try and make yourself look wholier than thou is pretty cowardly in my opinion.
Yeah. You've just been reported.

Definitely bad choice of words.

Hi guys.
So first of all: surprisingly, this is not another comment about the topic title! Instead, it's this:
Isn't there a logical fallacy for those people who take a part of an analogy that may have come off as negative, and twist it so that the newly created point they formed has that selected part of the analogy, but means something completely different?
Original quote:
"lets unite as one group. Like NATO or the EU or even frickin ISIS"
Responses,:
-"So you want us to be  terrorists now? Nope. No thanks."
-"you basically said we should act more like isis, and even if it was indirect, the point is still there for all to see."
ISIS was an example of a united group who, even though they cary out hanous actions and speak reprehensible words, are united as one. OP was making the (albeit ineffective example) that even the most evil of the evil are able to unite as one group, so why can't we? I'll agree with Burak though, that this was a "Definitely bad choice of words." I couldn't have said it better myself especially because though I know what it was trying to accomplish, it missed the mark both because it was ineffective, and because it will cause people to fixate and warp that like 5% of your otherwise valid though untactful point in that paragraph. Though I insist that there must be a fallacy for this picking apart one little piece of the message and warping it to create a new one, I recognise that it is a thing and a very common thing at that, so would not use this to communicate my message.
This was ineffective though because an evil agenda is not an indication of how well a group will band together. We band together to achieve a common goal, looking for those who wish to achieve the same goal and thus can help us or at least validate us. Whether you're raising money for a nonprofit, donation based children's hospital, or rounding up innocent people to lock in concentration camps, you're going to need help and you're going to want to find that help - and you're going to cooperate with the people helping you so long as it serves you and your agenda to do so.
Enough said about that. Now, on to the OP:
Mind chilling out with the name calling? It really doesn't spread the message of kindness and cooperation. There's a time and place for harsh words, yes, but a hasty generalization is not one of them. You should probably cut the attitude as well, because I'm not inspired. Like at all.
I'll layout kinda what you said, but with definitions.