No liam, they may not be original, but they were mixed, and he said he didn't use sounds from other games, when he clearly did. So yeah.

Not at all dear. I'm simply proving your post 10 bs. That's all.

@28 don't use the ad hominem falacy. it's one of the most irksome things people do on here. Your reputation will be better if you just admit to have used the branble boulder sounds or proving you didn't ,than getting defensive against him.
About the game, i think there is a way to time the throwing of the rock so that you hit the boulder, I did it once somehow, but not sure exactly how I did. I also think 2 minutes isn't nearly enogh time, it might get you to like level 3 if you get a bunch of speed up items but otherwise you hit level 2 and then have to stop.
How does it compare to the other endless runner games we have?
Compared to endless runner by mason, it's only got 1 dimension instead of 2, only 1 difficulty level, overall fewer terrain elements, and a much more limited free version. So I think I would rather be playing endless runner.
I also don't think that the game, as it stands, is worth $7. If you plan to add a lot more stuff to it, that's another story of course.

i hope people come up with some original games sune enough
yeah i know, i'M just dreaming,

@34, we seam to have same opinions when it comes to games. Lol. Maybe i'm wrong though.
+1, btw.

Yeah, I'm giving this one a pass.
There're plenty of people who'd be willing to host your website and other servers for free.

Good game, most deffenatly a rage inducer.  Thank you for also thinking about the mac, really appreciate it.
Now as for the rest of you, are we really going to rip on the authenticity of his sounds?  At least we have a dev who is still willing to give us audio games.  Not to mention after all the clone this and that.  And besides, the audio gaming world isn't it like it used to be.  Most if not all of the OG audio gaming companies that we all used to depend on for gaming fun are no more.  Instead of bitching about it, do someting, or just leave it be.

To Ivan and other developers, I am sure I am not alone on this.  In post 1 when you tell us about a new game, I don't want to click another link to load another webpage just to read more about a game.  In post one, tell us about the game don't have us cclick another stupid link just to read more about your game.  I'm not saying you have to post your read me file  but just give more info about a game within your first post.

@41 come on, don't be so lazy people.

@43 he might be lazy, but that's how a customer can be.

43, it's not about laziness, but if you actualy want to advertise your game, then it's not how it goes.
46, fully agreed.

I am going to say this with great care.
48 is, technically, right. Nobody forces you to develop audiogames. It's not your job, you're not getting paid, you do it for a hobby and in some cases, receive some compensation for your effort. Now, do I think that this game is worth it's price? That's a different question.
I haven't played the game yet, but by the concept alone, I'd say no. I paid for feer only because it had something this game didn't, an illusion of progress and getting somewhere. From what I can tell from just reading, this game doesn't. Moreover, it seems to have an endpoint where as feer does not, but I am not too sure about that so feel free to correct me. No. I wouldn't pay for this.
Another thing you have got to consider is that it's Ivan's first Python project. Though he has programming experience, it still takes quite a bit to switch from one language to another do to huge syntactical differences. That also drives my point home, however. You typically don't charge for the first project, most of the time because the code can get rather messy and fixing it would require a complete rewrite of some functions, again, I speak from experience here, lol.
Finally, you need to consider Ivan's history when it comes to paid products. Look at BM and TK and then ask the question... is it worth it?
On the other hand, though, Ivan is also correct in the fact that he is paying host fees. Fees that are probably a better deal than the normal prices of the hosting companies, about $10 per month seems to be an average (I am only estimating based on what I have read). Knowing that fact does make me consider buying the game, but again, I won't. Not yet, at least. Not enough replayability, though this game is not the only thing that lacks in that department. Mailman does too, but I digress.
At least this topic seems quite a bit more civil than mine, so there is that to consider.