It makes it sound so complex and scifi/fantasy superhero mcawesome, when you could swap out "sound" with "light" and "ears" with "light receptors" (people don't have extra internal eyes, afaik, but cones / rods / etc are specialized for different aspects, eye movements play a part, eye size, shape, spacing, angles, etc), and you're describing normal vision.
The precision to use individual leaves that way is impressive, but that's somewhat offset by the fact that insect-eating bats are pretty small. If a leaf is the comparable size of large furniture, then the main difference between leaves and my garbage can is that leaves are way more aesthetically pleasing. ... And abundant.
Nevertheless, bats could still utterly destroy me in an echolocation battle, even compensating for the size / environment differences, so eh. There is no excuse for getting lost in my own yard when the road, the building, the trees, and that little hill with the storm-cellar I'd be too afraid of squatting fanged things to use under it are all right there and unmoving. Maybe it'd be easier if I was a foot or two shorter? cause it feels like it would be, but maybe height advantage works with echolocation just as it does visually; I'm not sure why it wouldn't, unless there's a serious range limitation that makes the added distance cost more than can be gained from height.