I'd like to point out that the first commandment is impossible to obey. You cannot judge something completely without bias; there will always be bias in there. What you can do though is remove as much bias as possible; i.e.: attempt to act like a neutral third-party, unaffiliated with the matter at hand.

do what I say
do what I say
do what I say
do what I say
do what I say
do what I say
do what I say
do what I say
do what I say
do what I say

zarvox is correct, accept that sometimes admins don't follow these rules.

Yeah a crap ton of these are too alike, and abuse of power is kinda subjective.  Players have all sorts of opinions on what exactly that means, which often go right out the door within a week of becoming admin them selves.
Equally, without rules to govern players by, or a present head admin/dev to help settle bigger issues, it's hard to blame admins who have everything on their shoulders or have their hands tied while players use them as a punching bag.
These guidelines are also just too broad to fit into all games, and simpler is almost always better with this kind of thing, where as I see some padding to get to 10.

I’m probably going to Redraft a lot of these.  A few are probably going to be replaced.  This was not meant to be a perfect set of guidelines, nor, anything official. I just wanted to see if I could do it, and change things over time as suggestions came in.

The difference between a good admin, and a bad admin, is simply this:
A bad admin will check he is doing all of those things.
A good admin will know he is by the compliments of his players.

Thumbs up post 12

I'd thumb you up for that Jayde, except it's you who're writing it. It's about as hipocritical as a mass murderer proclaiming thou shalt not kill. I mean, he's correct, you should not kill, but the irony is still hilarious.