2019-01-19 19:14:24

What are your ownist prodictions for the blind in the future? I found his article and started to think.
America: The new Socialist frontier
America: The new Socialist frontier
© Getty Images
It seems that socialism is like an infectious disease that everyone has to get ill of to develop immunity. As Alexander Solzhenitsyn pointed out, “For us in Russia, communism is a dead dog, while for many people in the West, it is still a living lion.”
This dead dog, expelled from Russia, acquired a new life in the United States and regained vitality to become a living lion within the Democratic Party.
The 2018 Democratic victory in the midterms brought new Marxist arrivals to the House of Representatives who are interpreting the elections as an endorsement of socialist policies. They dropped all the pretenses — no liberals, no progressives — they are proud Marxist-Leninists driven by the ideology and committed to converting this country into the United Socialist States of America.
This militant crowd is comprised of uninformed and misinformed people looking at themselves as unfortunate, underpaid, underappreciated victims of capitalism, overwhelmed with jealousy that there are people who are everything they are not.
They are the face of new Democratic Party – “We have been naught, we shall be all.”
The Democratic Party explicitly casts itself as an inheritor of Marxism. The Democrats’ demands are almost total inversion of the Constitutional arrangements and traditional American values. The economic redistribution, open borders, repeal of the Second Amendment, the abolition of the Electoral College, the election of a president by popular vote, voting rights and free health care to illegal aliens are just part of the comprehensive strategy of putting the harness of socialism around the necks of the American people.
The driving force of the Democratic Party is economic “inequality” — the argument socialists have never tired of invoking since the dawn of capitalism. The mantra brought into play by the French Revolution — “War to the palace, peace to the cottage” — is alive and well today in the Democratic Party. The seductive idea of wealth redistribution has proved to be irresistible to the masses discontented by the inequities. The philosophy of envy and siphoning from the rich appeals to a large segment of the population that does not realize that the definition of “rich” is a spiral of devolution that eventually will reach every business and every individual who works for a living.
From the Democrats’ perspective, President Donald J. Trump is a disrupter of what had been a smooth transition to the bright socialist future. In a concerted effort to denigrate the President and paralyze executive authority, they are branding him a racist and blatantly subvert every program on his agenda. To render him ineffective, they actively support a collective mania for ever more sweeping investigations of dubious claims, rumors, unsubstantiated allegations and innuendos that has descended over the President, his family, his associates, and nominees. People who cannot even spell “impeachment” demand one without any substantiation. They act as if their fiat is turning the country into chaos, or as Lenin called it, “revolutionary environment.”
Unfortunately, the contemporary political thinking of the American people is more backward than that of the Russians or Chinese, and too many of them are living in a flat-earth, know-nothing, Jesse Watters’ world. Neither education, nor upbringing, nor life experience prepares Americans for grasping the veracity of the socialist assault on the American way of life.
Thanks to the fatuity of the American public, there has not been any effective comprehension of the totality of the assault nor its enervating effect upon national vigilance. We may surmise that the socialist dragon has come of age and socialism in America, be it democratic or otherwise, no longer looks like an exceedingly lofty ambition. 
The great historical irony is that unlike the Russian people who understood the perils of socialism and fought the Bolsheviks in a bloody three-year civil war that by some estimates took fifteen million lives, the freedom-loving Americans keep voting themselves into socialism.
Indeed, Communist leaders from Lenin to Brezhnev are sardonically grinning from hell and watching in disbelief as what was impossible for the Soviet Union to accomplish with all its military might and nuclear arsenal is being endorsed by the duly elected American legislators.
Fifty-five years ago, in 1964, Ronald Reagan gave a speech on behalf of presidential candidate Barry Goldwater that would become known as “A Time for Choosing.” His ardent warning of the advance of socialism in the United States resonates even more today:
"You and I have a rendezvous with destiny. We will preserve for our children this, the last best hope of man on earth, or we will sentence them to take the first step into a thousand years of darkness. If we fail, at least let our children and our children’s children say of us we justified our brief moment here. We did all that could be done."
Did we?
Alexander G. Markovsky is a senior fellow at the London Center for Policy Research, a conservative think tank hosted at King’s College, New York City, which examines national security, energy, risk-analysis and other public policy issues, He is the author of "Anatomy of a Bolshevik" and "Liberal Bolshevism: America Did Not Defeat Communism, She Adopted It.” He is the owner and CEO of Litwin Management Services, LLC.

Bitcoin Address:
1MeNca7h6m8du4TV3psN4m4X666p6Y36u5m

2019-01-19 21:11:38 (edited by Nocturnus 2019-01-19 21:12:38)

That article has a clearly conservative and republican agenda behind it.  I don't see that one extreme is honestly any better than the other, in all seriousness.  One side might want to say blind people are entirely incapable to show pity, while the other side would do so to say that we're a burden on society.  Take your pick.

When life gives you oranges, demand lemons since everyone else is obviously getting them.

2019-01-19 22:00:40

The future of the blind: same as the past. Stuff will get sorta-kinda better, then technology will take a huge leap, we'll be left out for a decade or fifty, repeat ad machina. Kings come and go, empires rise and fall, but the poor you will always have with you, until someone solves scarcity and distribution. And the blind you will have with you also, until you don't. Until then, more of the same: some good here, some less good there.
Basically, after all the breakneck technological change of the past century, what's changed? Software. And software won't hold still. So until someone solves blindness outright, I don't see any changes beyond the occasional NVDA or Seeing AI.
If the world does a swan-dive into the abyssal graves of communism, meh, would it be different if the world instead succumb to fascism,? Barring massive technological upheaval, we're approximately as doomed as always. So if you aren't especially doomed atm, keep on not being doomed. Me, I'ma kick the air until I can convince the powers that be that I'm not going to break the universe by doing something productive.

看過來!
"If you want utopia but reality gives you Lovecraft, you don't give up, you carve your utopia out of the corpses of dead gods."
MaxAngor wrote:
    George... Don't do that.

2019-01-20 02:10:15

I would ask @2 what is wrong with being a conservative? I know I'm one. I know many like me but I may be in the minority on this forum.

Bitcoin Address:
1MeNca7h6m8du4TV3psN4m4X666p6Y36u5m

2019-01-20 02:10:47

And I don't think that most conservatives believe what you think they do about the blind.

Bitcoin Address:
1MeNca7h6m8du4TV3psN4m4X666p6Y36u5m

2019-01-20 03:34:47

I don't really know that conservatives really know what they believe about blind people.  If you can get 200 conservatives all in a room who all agree concerning blind people being equalls to them, you have my vote as president of the United States, should you be tempted to run.  I don't say that lightly.  I've been in 4 different churches over the past 5 years, none of which took me seriously as a person.  When I'm not an asset, I'm a liability, but I'm not altogether a person equal to them.  Maybe it has to do with the book of Leviticus, or maybe it has to do with the fact that I'm a minority, or perhaps because I actually want to ask all the hard hitting questions and not get kneejerk responses that all paint me as the faithless doofus responsible of traitorous complicity.  Long as I eloquently, articulately tout the church's partyline, I'm a wonderful saint who has a better grasp on God than most everyone else and who uses his talent for his glory and his kingdom and his majesty forever and ever amen.  Ask a question that doesn't have an easy answer?
And no, I don't hate people.  I said I was disgusted with both extremes because I am.  One quietly holds back in my presence short of telling me I'm a strain and a drain on taxes, government, economy, medical insurance, you name it.  The other side will parade me as a statistic that needs all the help I can get while ignoring the fact that they're equally suggesting my mommy had every right to kill me before I ever got my feet on the ground in an attempt to walk.  Do all people hold to those values?  Nah, humans are still individuals capable of controling and dictating their own individualistic responses rather than aligning themselves with one side of the seesaw or the other.  How often does it happen?  I dunno, but I suppose it happens enough that I'm even capable of thinking about it happening at all.

When life gives you oranges, demand lemons since everyone else is obviously getting them.

2019-01-20 07:12:38 (edited by flackers 2019-01-20 07:42:40)

Whether socialism is a workable political ideology or not doesn't change the fact that you can't call it freedom and democracy when you're vilifying to that hysterical extent, anyone who doesn't adhere to a particular political viewpoint. In a true democracy people are allowed to hold political views of any sort. It's up to the people to decide whether they're valid or not. Saying it's unpatriotic to have a certain political view is undemocratic. That article is filled with the most ridiculous mud-slinging: like saying everyone who believes in socialism can't spell. It was one of the stinkiest pieces of journalism I've read. It's just garbage, has nothing to do with blindness, and is just an excuse to post insanely biased political propaganda on a forum that has nothing to do with politics. It was pretty much a political hate speech. If people want to start a political thread in the off topic room of course they should be allowed to do so, even if it is a recipe for flame wars, but don't dress it up as being relevant to the blind folks that make up the majority of this community when the link is so tenuous as to barely exist.

2019-01-20 09:30:14

@6
There's the political post I was looking for. smile
@5
I don't think anyone said that there was anything wrong with being a conservative. It was just pointed out that the article you linked to was very... one-sided... and full of bias. Not to discredit your experiences with conservatives, but I"m not really sure how you can speak for most of them. (Especially when it comes to opinions about disabilities) You might have had great relationships with some, but you can't generalize an entire group of people based on your own personal experiences. (And this goes for both extremes of the political pole obviously)

Trying to free my mind before the end of the world.

2019-01-20 18:25:16

Seven and 8 get it.  In the end it's not a question about what party you swing with, but what kind of person you are individually that can make all the difference.  For every fault you can name for liberals and democrats I can name one for conservatives and republicans and or the other way around.
Conservatives think liberals are immoral atheists who all believe in anything so long as it can scientifically be published as a theory, who will live as if life has no consequence.  Liberals believe conservatives are ignorant at best, stupid at worst, for believeing in books full of fairytales and holding to antiquated practices because that's what they've always held to.  Conservatives argue that freedom of speech gives one the right to claim homosexuality is an abomination.  Liberals would limit that kind of freedom because it promotes exclusivity and isolation, while simultaneously using their own kind of hate speech in words like homofobic hatemongering biggot and not seeing that at all as negative or insensitive.  Conservatives will tell you they work hard hours even when it's clear all they've done is inherit their parents' wealth.  Liberals will tell you their parents worked hard and so they personally know what it's like for a family to struggle, all the while advocating for taxing the wealthiest based on their wealth regardless of anything else.  Conservatives willingly ignore their families had to come here from somewhere else as migrants.  Liberals willingly ignore the threats an entirely open door policy would pose to every citizen of such a country.  Conservatives willingly erect confederate flags as so-called historical landmarks no matter who's feelings they hurt.  Liberals would burn them down because they're offensive, simultaneously proclaiming that history should not be forgotten but not glorified.
I just finished reading an article that says that politics have turned social media into a steaming pile  of hate, but I actually think it's the other way around; social media has turned our politics and our political discussions into hatefests.   Every news article I read now where subjects are polarizing, you'll find that it's journalists who note that social media has stirred an uproar.  Instead of going outside and forging friendships through personal interactions as we once did, where a friendship actually meant something because people were people regardless if we could or could not agree on everything, we now find it much, much easier to stay within our own little social circles, unfriending and unfollowing one and all who disagree with us or doing even worse by trolling them because we're annonymous which means we can be anyone we wana be and never get caught.  There's a thin thin line between love and hate and all of our beloved platforms are learning how to exploit said line for their own personal gains, sharing data back and forth with one another to gather as much information about all of us to keep their companies as proffitable as possible.  The market is all that matters; people and their feelings are the casualties.
You can claim to be a conservative, a centrist democrat, a liberal, a millennial, a memmber of Generation Z, a man, a woman, a homosexual, a heterosexual, an a-sexual, a mutated pile of genetics that just managed to escape becoming a snowflake, but whatever you claim, it's the words and the actions that are going to dictate who and what you are.  I'm human; I'm not perfect.  I'm going to disappoint and I'm going to be disappointed.  My life is not an ongoing political statement; it is a process full of experiences between when I was born and when I breathe my last in this world.  I learn, love, laugh, need, want, wish, wait, come and go, stay when I have to and walk away when I have to, fight when the chips are down and run when the race has yet to be won, do my best to limit confusion and solve problems, and if I can't make a friend out of you and I find that you can't make a friend out of me I'll give you the chance to respectfully move on because I expect you to do the same for me.  I'll be glad you're you and that I'm me, knowing all the while that it takes all sorts to make the world go round.

When life gives you oranges, demand lemons since everyone else is obviously getting them.

2019-01-20 18:41:27

#deletefacebook #TwitterDalendaEst #trogdor2020, because Trogdor BURNiNATES everyone equally.

看過來!
"If you want utopia but reality gives you Lovecraft, you don't give up, you carve your utopia out of the corpses of dead gods."
MaxAngor wrote:
    George... Don't do that.

2019-01-21 19:15:58 (edited by Jaseoffire 2019-01-21 19:19:25)

Hmm. Yeah, that article is a bit skewed indeed. The first thing that came to mind was this. While my experiences are purely anticdotal, I have found that most  of the worker class, particularly those in the rust belt, tend to want nothing to do with socialism. The trouble is that the prospect of potentially losing what they worked to obtain is not a fun prospect for them. It seems to be the more well educated and wealthy members of society that want a more socialistic system for what that's worth. As for the matter of conservatives, getting 200 of them to agree on anything would be a feat. From what I've learned, american conservatism is made up of several ideologies. This is why it can be a bit difficult for them to get anything done in the first place. The issue though these days seems to be the amount of polarization and discord that make up the political system at the moment. It seems to be worse than usual lately, though, that could be just as easily my imagination. LOL!!! Either way, we need to find something to get everyone at least in a negotiation mood, and the latest social and political antics aren't getting us very far. Ah well. The world goes on.
(edit) I forgot to answer the question. Oops. My prediction is that we'll probably be on a slow route of progress for a while. It will require something rather revolutionary to get us both excellorating and keeping up with the rate of current technological trends. It's not impossible, it's just going to take a lot of work to achieve.

I have a website now.
"C: God's Programming Language
C++: The object-oriented programming language of a pagan deity" -- The Red Book
"There, but for the grace of God go I"