Moderation:

I really, really don't want to have to do this, but here goes.

Thatguy, post 3 clearly violates several rules of the forum.
1. The document lists first and last names, which have been posted ostensibly without the permission of those being referenced. If you can provide incontrovertible proof that this permission was granted prior to the release of the sensitive information - and good luck doing that, by the way - I'll drop this point. Otherwise, that's a warning all on its own. We do not give out sensitive info about other people for any reason without their express consent.
2. Given that many claims have been made against many individuals for behaviours which may tarnish their reputation, and given that no proof has been furnished, I would judge this to be a form of mild to moderate character assassination. This marks another warning. Surely this document could have made its points without calling anyone out?
3. There are no specific links to cracked software, but the document linked to in post 3 is quite clear on what you will get from the so-called essentials package, and some of that is illegal. While this site does not host that file, posting links to copyrighted material is against the rules. This merits another warning.

Normally, your third warning means an instant thirty-day ban, and if it were just me and no one else, I would probably do that. Posting your link in this thread is a gross miscarriage of pretty much all standard forum conventions. It flies in the face of good internet etiquette, in the sense that someone came here asking for help and you provided a ringing condemnation of the community, much of which is either straight-up false or heavily exaggerated. Short of straight-up attacking the original poster, you probably couldn't have been more harmful if you tried. In a sense, the document is almost a form of "community assassination" which just so happens to smear a few specific members.
As such, here's what's going to happen.
1. You've got enough warnings for a ban as far as I'm concerned, but at this moment in time I'm not going to ban you. We will review the situation and decide whether a ban is needed.
2. I am removing post 3, and the link it contains.
3. I am asking that no one redistribute this document in this thread or in any other. I can't stop you if you want to spread it around privately amongst yourselves, but please don't send it without being asked first, and please don't post it anywhere else publicly. Anyone receiving this document without having asked for it first, please let me know so that I can investigate it. It is my strong opinion that as satirical and tongue-and-cheek as it is, this document represents far more harm than good in its current form, so I want to limit its scope as much as is reasonable.
4. I wish to encourage anyone uncertain that this document does not, in fact, serve as an accurate representation of the community in general. There are truthful bits, and there are bad elements in the community including strange behaviours, tendencies and standards, but that is true of literally any group. Some blind people have good jobs, solid social lives within and outside of the blind community, excellent social skills, good manners, solid relationships, etc. In fact, I'd wager that the fair majority are nowhere near as strange as that document makes them look. If you must read it at all, take everything therein with an enormous grain of salt.