2018-12-18 00:10:36 (edited by Jason SW 2018-12-18 00:11:24)

I agree with most people here. The only people this will be effective against is those who don't know how to get around the blocks, and those who don't want to put too much effort into getting around the blocks. Even if you give people school laptops with programs installed to limit what can be viewed, people will always find ways around them if they really want to. Unless you can completely lock down the computer, so the student can't get access to the hardware, can't modify the operating system or any installed programs, or modify critical settings, it's not going to work. Even then, someone will probably eventually find a vulnerability in the security of the system that will let them change whatever they want.
TL;DR: Site blocking is futile.

2018-12-18 01:47:37

Relevant song link is relevant: 



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zBDCq6Q8k2E


     The only small reprieve banning porn on university wireless networks would be much faster internet for a while, until people figure out how to get around the filters.  Anyway, I don't see what's wrong with people looking at whatever they want that is not illegal.  Anyway, it's not like a lack of porn is going to stop people from persuing it...or uh, masterbaiting instead... or actually having sex.... or whatever complaint goes against the current iteration of the moral guardians.  Hell, the little scene above on the link would technically count due to the song matter with a broad sweeping definition of pornography,  despite it being satire.

The answer to your question is forum.audiogames.net/search