That's true. But with over 1000 posts, camlorn's clearly helped more people than you at this point, so that's why people look to him. You're right, that perhaps people shouldn't be judged by their past, but unfortunately most people would disagree with that.

Yeah. But, Sender hasn't been active in god knows how long and if he has, I never hear what he's posted or about his reputation. with Camlorn, it's different: you always, see him in the developers room, always showing off his tech knolege. Unfortunately, and this is not an insult to your character, you have been involved is several flame wars, and that might make people weary to follow your advice. People can change, however, and as a result other people's impressions of them can do the same. You're by no means a bad person, but some of the posts you've written have been on the harsh side, and that might drop your credibility some.

I'm quite sure he has. He stands ferm in his positions and I'm sure that's caused him some flame wars. But he's almost always the first to help in most programming situations.

Meh yeah. and what good, I ask, does it to help people then? If they always take Camlorn's side on something, then you may as well not post; not because your word isn't worth reading, but because if they aren't gonna listen, whatever whatever. And when you do post, and Camlorn decides to post something over it, that's his problem, I guess. Just keep doing your thing and perhaps one day people will listen. Do that which you're actually passionant about: developing my racing game, I love doing it, and I literally wouldn't be discouraged if no one decided to play it.

Yeah. And indeed that can get overly annoying. But again. whatever. you can be the bigger person, and know that you don't have to five-up everyone else to make yourself the apex of the world of computer knolege.

So do I, at times, but when I know it can't be then I just keep my valuable thoughts (given I have any) to myself. If people wanted it, then you should've listened earlier when I was trying to voice it.

First, as I read it, you're contradicting me.  I did not say 32-bit after you said 64-bit.  You didn't come in on that issue before I did.
Second, if you have written an OS kernel but it never booted, you have not written an OS kernel.  Having written software implies that it worked.  This is pretty unarguable.  Also, if you had written an OS kernel, you'd know why 64-bit pointers on the x86 architecture have to be 8 bytes.
Third, my first post contradicting you was not the size of a book or really even that long.  We only kept going because you kept making errors, and I'm sorry but you can't claim knowledge on an issue if you're going to go as far as to make factual errors in the same post you use to outright call the other person a liar.
And fourth, I think it's time for some bluntness.  I don't care if this backfires because, honestly, it's threads like this one that make me want to leave this forum and not look back.  I have been being polite on this issue for a very, very long time.  I don't think that you guys realize how exasperating this is from my end of it.  I have more knowledge on this topic.  Anyone with more knowledge than me would agree with this statement.  In order for Ethin to have been programming for as long as I have, he would have had to have been doing it since he was 5 (the collaboration thread has your age).  I have had the opportunity to go through college.  I do not pull the things I have to say out of the air, and I can usually back them up with links to sources and other articles.  And yet somehow this keeps getting turned into me somehow claiming superior intelligence or something.  I'm sorry, but that's not how this kind of thing works.  I'm 23.  I've had more experience.  When Ethin is 23, he might be way further along than I am.
I commented further here because there are errors in what Ethin says.  We are programers.  When another programmer tries to say something which is correct only if half the relevant facts are left out, I'm going to add them.  If I am attacking anything, it is the information under discussion.
I will close by saying this.  If I did not know more than Ethin, he would spend a lot more time attacking my information, possibly by providing links that prove me wrong.  It is very easy to do so if the other person is wrong.  Instead, the attacks are almost always aimed at me as a person.

I do not throw fits to game attention, defender. It sounds to me on post 40 like you threw a fit right there. I'm not going to comment about that post.
@Camlorn, I see. I don't want you to leave. I just want myself to be heard, but when people like Defender over there keep saying negative things about me, it kind of dims your outside self.

Look Defender. Because of what you wrote in the second part of your post I have nothing negative to say to you.
  I don't myself think Camlorn's a know it all, or that when Ethin posts flaming posts it's OK. What I'm trying to tell him is, if he thinks no one is listening to him, to not try and drag it out and rather move on with his life so that topics such as these won't spiral out of hand.
  The reason I haven't been as bad as I was a few months ago can be discussed between me and you through private message if you'd like. But yes I have changed, in that I'm not really up for going on heavily flaming rampage rants such as I was abliged to do a few months ago. But as you said, a former troll. I was but am not so much now. And I'm by no means calling Ethin's flaming posts acceptable, just trying to give him advice, while also not explisitly stating that he's "silly and wrong"

@ethin. I post advice all the time about my development, and what advice I have to give. Camlorn most likely has a better methid of doing it than I do. I don't complain, because as far as I cair. I already gave my helping hand, if you choose to follow camlorn's advice, go ahead. I don't really understand why you are so upset. You've gotten your point out, you've gotten your advice said, camlorn got his advice said. You don't need to be above him, and honestly, the way you've been acting is making me really ashamed to even keep you on the administration staff for dmnb and reality software, as much as i'm thankful for everything you've done for us.

@Danny, I've told this to you a million times, a million different ways, over Skype. I was being extremely polite when addressing my differences from post 24 onwards. I don't see how you can't notice that. I'm not happy for what I did to Camlorn, because I'm starting to understand him better. I will be sending him a PM soon. When I will is unknown to me, but I will probably send it immediately after I finish this post - although he probably won't receive it immediately.

It's true that perhaps I tend to get involved in conflicted topics such as this where I didn't really belong. But I just thought I'd try to step in here and see if I could do anything... yeah. But my intentions certainly wern't as they were in previous topics like that huge fight that broke out in November or something.
  It's just not so ffun to me any more. Especially when I know I could be spending my time on the computer doing better things such as programming my game, playing other games, blogging, etc. I mean, as much as I hate to say this, getting involved into these conflicts is just, like a drunken rage. You feel the high when you're flaming some one, and get madder when some one else flames you. Meh, meh, meh.