wightfall wrote:after reading couples of post from my perspective it seem admin using their power than there should do in meat bug
I have one question before people was jailing does the admin give warning when one of admin online
if not it seem you are using your power againt player in term of "bug report advantage" I know if they use and stop it should be fine but give some warning so they know what they do is not allow
about item description you said that you are forgotten because human nature I as a player would ask as soon as you remember why not write any description for telling player so they know info
if anything not clear please ask me I will respond as soon as I read your post
The main issue was that, as far as we knew, the bug was already purposfully spredding. Meaning, that, people not only used it, but used it on purpose, forcing us to take a more drastic action. If, as you said, the bug would have been on a small scale, and people stumbling on it by accident, then warnings would have worked just fine. However, I'm having a difficult time believing that 67 players, just stumbled on it by accident. Yes, 67, because thanks to the log we could track down exactly who, and how often, exploited the whole thing, without, and this I checked too, any single report what so ever that there might be something strange going on. To be as transparant, without spilling the beans on who or how many, those 67 people were split up into 3 categories:
- less than 50: might be accidental, unawareness, or just rotten luck
- between 50 and 250: defenatly aware something is rong, just failing to report, and or, knowing full well it was something that could be rong, not bothering to report.
- above 250: defenatly sure they knew it could have been broken, without asking or reporting anything, and defenatly exploiting it to their own advantage.