Great idea as these were awesome multiplayer games. My guess is that maybe you could track down the original guys behind the project on social media or what have you and explain to them your position. I was almost gonna buy a subscription till I heard that it's pretty much gone as far as we can tell. It was  sold to for-the-people.come I believe before the owner passed away.

I, too, spent hours at all in play, throwing around the holdem chips, lol.
When Jennifer died, the site went dead.  I liked Jen as a person, but her ownership/management/leadership skills struck me as weak.  The site was a shambles in terms of the coding, the structure, the way that it was handled by hosting servers, etc.  Her family has since said that they want to get the site back on its feet.  However, they had significant issues finding a programmer willing to recode everything correctly, and the site itself had to also be recoded so that it could work with the updated hosting servers.  we have heard nothing in months.  I'm on the all in play mailing lists, and I have seen no traffic from it in a very long time.  So, I am thinking that most likely their ability to get things in order fell through, and that all in play is gone.  That's a shame.  And despite her lack of management skills, I know that Jennifer would not be pleased.

@SLJ,
Basically, they couldn't afford to pay a programmer worth their salt who could understand the antiquated code of the games to be able to reprogram them in an updated language.  THe couple of programmers they found gave up halfway through the project, never completing it.  When I go to their site, I receive the CPanel site, which tells me that the domain is now dead.  Like I said, it's a shame, and Jen would not be happy.  Thing is, though, while the site was running, while they had our subscriptions, they should have been rewriting old code so that this wouldn't have been an issue.  Several of us kept telling Jen that she needed to get a programmer, but that never occurred, even though several experienced programmers in the blind community, actual members of the site, offered to help with the coding.  If she had pursued that years ago, the site would probably still be going strong.

JLove

@Aprone,
Several experienced programmers in our community offered to do some work for free, and the rest at severely discounted rates, and she still never took them up on it.  That's why I said that her leadership/management/business skills were weak.  And she didn't have a clue about what coding truly entailed, or the prices actually charged, and therefore, she was an easy mark to be used.  A great person, abysmal businesswoman, lol.  Elles was her husband, I believe.  The person that was helping them after she died was named Steven, but I suspect that he just got overwhelmed with the immense size of the project, and I also think he got discouraged at not being able to find a competent programmer willing to help them, so he just gave up.

JLove

It's a shame, though, because now the only site we have to play poker on is Blind Adrenaline.  And yeah, it's fun at times, most of the people are okay.  Of course, there's always a few that aren't, but that's anywhere you go in life.  My main problem with that site is the owner.  He's extremely controlling, to the point of dictatorial.  And there are times that he can be a straight up asshole.  I joined BA shortly after its inception, and things were more pleasing.  We used to have a lot of fun there; it was much more laid back.  You could find three or four tables going at once, and at least one of them was high stakes.  We'd play until 2 or 3 in the morning, sometimes later.  We had high stakes SAGs, sit and gos, of 500k, a million.  Then, for absolutely no reason, he decided that everyone should lose all of their chips and start over.  Some of us had millions.  None of us were pleased, and we all voiced our opinion that it would set the site back hugely.  He didn't listen.  And from that day forward, he lost a huge chunk of his membership.  He as gotten more and more controlling.  He has this attitude that we should all play poker as though we're professionals at the WSOP.  My view, and several of the other players there, is this:  As long as I am a paying member of the site, and I am spending my own money to play poker, then I should be able to play poker any way that I please, and I certainly should not lose my several-million chip stack for absolutely no reason.  That was my biggest gripe with the reset.  Today, that decision to reset everyone so many years ago is still having ramifications.  Very, very rarely will you find a table above 500-chip blinds.  SAGs are most often 10k.  Every great once in a while someone will get up the courage to put up a 50k, and 100k is virtually unheard of.  Now, contrast that:  With all in play, the site was exceptionally laid back, and as long as no one blatantly disrespected someone, or was caught cheating, etc., they were allowed to play any way they pleased, and chips we earned, we got to keep.  Jen didn't constantly insert herself into players' game styles, or insist that players should play a certain way, should only raise a certain amount, etc.  At one point I had approximately 169 million there.  So it's a shame to me that a site where the focuses were on having fun and enjoying social camaraderie is no more, and we are left with but one choice where we're constantly waiting for the next stupid decree from on high.  Lol.  And I happen to really, really like holdem.

JLove

Lol, ain't that the truth?  I cannot fathom treating customers that way.  The first thing that they teach you is that the customer is always right.  So many of us told him that a chip reset was going to cause lots of folks to leave, and we were right.  He didn't listen to us.  That's my main beef with che...he doesn't really care about his customers.

Wow. Sounds impossible to get it up and running again. If we could get the sourcecode we could do something, but then it might be better to rewrite it all from scratch.
I thought The Playroom had Poker as well? Now I haven't played Poker and I'm not sure about the rules etc. But if the game is that much addicting, it would be interesting to take a look at it later on.

Quenton C's playroom is just a huge thing with no changes. Last change, but really good change was long long long time ago and I am shoor that nobody want's to translate there 100000 character message into french just to get no answer. Still, there is ba card room, old, rusty, dusty, with an angry guy who wants to poke his nose into everything that he wishes, not to menshen that thing with chips, and what about rale racer, I know that it's off topic but, cant help not referencing it. So what's better a guy who doesn't no a word in English, with only his 3 friends as admins, I only see one of them online at one time, and that one time is all most never, and an old BA card room, nobody on there, with a guy who as I have all reddy said, want's to poke his nose every where and wants to do what ever he likes, regardless of what players as his customers say. Guise, isn't it better to start from absolute 0 or, better to say, from berr earth and start from skrach? we cant expect anything from chee or quenton, but we can expect something if not anything from the new devs that are both part of this forum and devs in general can make an accessible version of there  card room very easyly.
Kind regards, Aleksandar
ps: we cant get all in play running so we cant compare it as of now. and JLove, it seems that you have bin faster in typing then me,