The moderators are already discussing the nature of the rule. And I agree with Aprone here that one is needed and that we will always defend game developers against theft, no matter what. This topic is just about the UltraPower code.
I searched the forum, looking for many of the past posts on this issue by the moderators. I have been very careful to state clearly that permission is not granted, until further notice by Mason (and now other involved parties, by logical extension). If the involved coders are now giving notice, then I don't actually see a contradiction in allowing this one game. We would still defend against code theft, but allow this game exclusively, as an exception. But I'm fairly sure that when I wrote those words, I imagined--as I did in the first post of this thread--that the code would inevitably be opened up, not merely that one game would get permission. As I and Aprone have already said, it's pretty meaningless to make an exception for this one game, because we'd still have to check in for every new clone somehow (remember, Mason, that you only recently reappeared on this board--you might imagine how things would have turned out without you), and we already know that DM is based on UltraPower code. But of course, the decision ultimately lies with the authors of the code, and we will do all we reasonably can to keep that promise we originally made to Mason. That's fair, I think. Future developers will have our new "anti-theft" rule for cover, and I hope we'll be clear that developers bear responsibility for ensuring that their code is reasonably protected from disclosure and reporting any suspected breaches (with a suitably high bar for evidence). Then, God helping, this sort of nonsense doesn't ever occur again.
For now, absent any new information, I think we will have to defend the code. I think that's clear. If we can't get permission from all the people who wrote it, then we simply can't make any allowances. I think that will have to be the case until such time as everybody involved comes forward and categorically agrees to allow it. Since Mason says he isn't the only author of this code, DM will have to be regarded as a "clone" just like all the other games, and disallowed from the forum, until this happens. I just can't see any other way at the moment, but I'm open to suggestions.
Just myself, as usual.