hi,
though I had no intention of replying further at first place, but I've seen a few instances on the forum where it has been brought to our attention that on the internet there are only written words based on which many people tend to draw certain conclusions of their own and consider a statement somewhat different from its original intended meaning. in other words, a person can draw ten different conclusions of their own based on just a single statement, and that may not entirely represent the views of the moderators, or the community as a whole.
please bare in mind that every person firstly, do not have English as their first language, secondly, belongs to various regions, and thirdly they belong to all kind of groups, and moreover, their style of conveyance can be different owing to their primary language and various other factors. a person can have a different intention, either general or specific, but it can be interpreted in various ways by a person who tends to be judgemental all the time.
for example, it does not do any good if someone starts jumping the guns after a slight bit of noise, or upon sensing a slight movement which has nothing to do with the present scenario, when at the same time there are other people in place to deal with this kind of situation as well. besides, that very person wouldn't be contributing to the cause by firing repeated shots which are totally uncalled for. this should be enough to make a situation sound worse compared to it was before that action, probably.
what i want to bring forward here is the consequences of this repeated behavior again and again. suppose the person who wrote the above didn't intend it to sound as harsh and narrow as interpreted by someone, would he feel comfortable to comment further on another similar thread later on? in short, this is not encouraging at all and wouldn't help anyone accept proving how biased and paranoid this behavior seems like, from the person who does nothing better but to smack down on those posts which, according to his so called conclusion, are over a certain criteria. if that is the case, I don't think that the moderators here are so ignorant as not to take any sort of action, and if not, then that person gets nothing as he isn't a moderator of course.
in short, if someone is not a moderator, they shouldn't assume a responsibility to act like one, and if they really feel something is going against the rules, better use that report button and let them decide, instead of coming here and being consistent with jumping the guns again, and again, and again on almost every post which is not written according to that very person's taste. I don't think that is the way a forum works, no sir.
p.s. I'll try to be careful next time while posting on a thread which talks about any Indian topic, as this forum is certainly not based in India, no way.
(I hoped there would be no flaming session, but alas).
regards.
He picked up the wrench and broke the guy’s wrist with it, one, and then the other wrist, two, and turned back and did the same to the guy who had held the hammer, three, four. The two men were somebody’s weapons, consciously deployed, and no soldier left an enemy’s abandoned ordnance on the field in working order.