Sorry to double post, cancel that. The blog I found the link on was usually reliable and was only just posted today, but I've been unable to verify this through other sources. If it was genuine I'm sure there would be more than one site reporting it.

The fools have it coming? eh? What's wrong with wifi?

Personally i hope it's an april fools myself. any idea on the reasoning behind this Cx2 if it is true?

while it wouldn't surprise me, judging by government policy recently, if Wifi is believed to be in some way detrimental to security then I'd say it's deffinately in trouble from the us government.

I will say though that legislation against weerd things for random reasons seems much more the style of the Labour party over here, ---- afterall what sain person passes laws against hoodies?

while I'm not sure about the Us government being better at this, they do seem to have more of a game plan of some sort, ---- security and big business, ---- even if I personally disagree with that plan, at least it is! a plan.

What I mean by full is sample. I the US gov tries to get red of wifi, then the people may have a word about it. I'm hoping thow it's a joke.

good god!
I hope its a hoax, I mean I love wifi
anyway, I thought just while we are on the topic
I know this is tuchy, but I am super curious, do any of you guys from those countries like the UK and Holand have friends or know people who dislike the US?
and why.
Oh Canada too.
And if someone on here that dislikes America, don't post, but if you do, I assure you I won't scold you, because then i would get in trouble.

Actually it seems digital freeview in the UK has improved its coverage a lot, and has far more channels. I believe they want to sell the freqs for another generation of mobile phones. I think they just needed to set up the infrastructure which happened remarkably fast and effectively given how long they had to set up the analogue network.

As to hating the US, I actually despise the "current administration" but I understand the difference between a government and the people. I treat everyohne as an individual no matter how utterly stupid their elected government might be.

on thing I forgot, one thing I hate in politics is the partisan for political parties.
If I am not mistaken, George Washington said something in his last address which said that we shouldn't seperate ourselves from each other or something. (heard it from my older brother)
nevertheless, I do think that people should just think logicly and not let a political party break the flow of important idas, and making sensable decisions.

Myself I don't claim to "believe" in a party, it is unwise to put yourself in a labelled slot I feel. I do think leaving Iraq now would be a mistake, but I also feel a little more caution before going in would have been wise. If you can't go in with the full backing of the UN and NATO you're making it more trouble than it is worth.

I'm one of those that trys to pick the lesser of the two evils if you get what I mean. If I think you will stand up for what I stand for, then I might vote for you, but I would exspect that you won't do everything you say. In short, broken prommesses are to much of a part of now days Polloticks To not exspect other wise. This is going to far isn't it?

Cool thead here - I am not party particular. I'm a bit more of a democrate now a days. But it does not matter too much. Any one person does not set the pace for long if they can at all. The US is a Federal Republic and really a two party system. For a few years, it is a very controled Monocracy with plenty of oversight. Just my take. The Pres has lots of power, but he or (maybe she soon) better walk a very straight line. The economic ties with government and how that affects each of us in our daily lives and the choices we have that exist - exists in a tremendous under current of interest group activity at many levels. I suspect true policy making to impower the common man here is rare and usually involves judicial oversight.

Why digital, wifi et all? Bandwidth and money, risk and invesment, give man choices and make him think he has to choose - thus spend his money.

Man is to be protected, managed, and used it seems. Make him free enough to be of good use. Keep him on the treadmill for the most part it seems to me. LOL! Chaos ensues otherwise I suspect. Too many people.

Just for fun ... so you are a philosopher Dark? The age old question - if a tree falls in the forest and no one is there to hear it, does it make a sound? And how do you know one way or the other? One common answer is - does it really matter? Can't use that one.

Take stab at it guys. There is an answer. It has to deal with burden of proof ...

Sorry I have not done much on game programming, I am off on another tangient again.

LOL. I know how that is. When will the press learn. Also, if you tern to the web for your news, then you have to know what is false and what isn't, like that wifi thing.

The BBC here tend to be pretty good, the newspapers here in Britain I gather all have their own agendas and affiliations can't speak for the US ones. The news on some TV channels here like ITV is truly atrocious though, it is just utterly braindead.