I've been wondering that for a long time. I really want to see this game

I tink before you come out with a sequel you need to fix the bugs in one lol no offense

An update from the dev would be greatly appreciated, considering how much I love entombed.

Alternatively, I'll mention this.. The original game should probably be made open-source or reclassified as abandonware. All of the bugs in that thing are nowhere near worth $40. It's pretty shitty business operation  to charge people so much for a clearly abandoned, half-finished product that doesn't, and probably won't receive, any additional updates. Though it's not the same type of game... Survive the Wild costs around a third of that at $15 for a premium account, and that game has 10x the depth, functions properly,  and actually receives updates. If the code for Entombed was put out there, i'm pretty sure there'd be a few people in the community that would jump at the oppurtunity to try to fix some of it's more irritating bugs. (Like the inability to use great swords that are incredibly overpriced.)

Not trying to be a downer or be Mr. Negative. Just putting my two cents in. People who disagree are entitled to that. Just my opinion.

Swagtastic, I like the game and it's genry, but I completely agree with you there. The game is old and we have stuff that overcomes it in quality and is also free. Not trying to diminish the efforts of the developers or anything, but guess you guys got my line.
Best regards, Haramir.

Is anything even happening with this game? I've played entombed and beaten it once. I liked the idea but sadly didn't find it all that engaging. I think a lot of it had to do with the baron landscape as others have suggested. That and I totally missed the hype train leading up to the game (if that was even a thing.) I played it about a year after it's release, probably because I had no idea it was even a thing until it was.

Oh, just ignore it and it will fade away, just like all the other old threads.

ug!
Do you know, not me because I've seen this thread, how many people you probably freaked out.
They see, entombed 2, and then realize the first post was like 5 or more years ago!
Make! A separate! Thread!

This wasn't a really old topic. 2015 isn't massively long ago. Also last posts were less than a year ago so.

hay, at'least it's  2015, not 2010 or  like 7 or 8years ago, it's still new, and i'm wondering about   the developer if he is still in the forum, last post from him was in 2015

The game is abandoned. The problem we have in this community is that no one develops these games full time. In addition, it seems like no one wants to team up and collaborate on a big project. *sigh*

I don't wana be a jerk, I really don't, but this has gone on enough.
Chris, what's your problem, man?
Is every game developer supposed to spend all their time on making games and never abandon them? Shocker, Chris, they don't. In the mainstream community, projects get abandoned. Projects drop like flies. Projects lose support and you buy them at your own risk. So, why? Why are audiogame developers held to "Support games for eternity" standard?
We should have group projects. Totally, Chris, totally. Let me see you learn how to code, build up a trust with the community, become respected, and then try and find a team and keep it together. Then we'll see how much you scream about teamwork. I love group effort, and I, the same as you, believe that great things happen when a crowd of talented individuals get together and collaborate, but it's much, much more difficult than just saying "Hey! Let's make a game together!" You need to make sure you can work with the person or people in question, you need to make sure that everyone who is going to collaborate has at least the same level of experience, and you need to have a clear goal in mind, not a basic idea. You need to plan, you need to understand and picture your final product, you need to make sure that everyone has a task that they can accomplish within a reasonable time, and you need to have a way of enforcing deadlines. Have fun with that.
I would also like to point out several general issues: How are you gonna pay the developers for their time? How much will you pay them? How will you deal with the different times and locations? Will you allow some fallback time if a person has failed to meet their expected date? What is the punishment for failing multiple times? What is the minimal level of experience allowed on a team? Who is in charge of balancing and mechanics? Who writes the story? How do you split the work evenly across the entire team? What are your deadlines going to be? What is the platform you will use for your work? How are you going to decide if a person who has a questionable background is allowed on your team? And so on.
So, Chris, yes. Show everyone that group projects are easy by organizing one yourself. Let me know how it works out.
As for full time development, do we really need to discuss why we don't have a lot of that? Yes? Fine.
I'll give a major example: Youtube. Do you know how many people live by making videos for their channel? Hundreds. Do you know why they are able to do that? Here's a hint: views. Here's an answer: People. By getting a lot of views, the owner of a Youtube channel can potentially get more advertisements. The ads in turn will give that person more money, which will lead to them buying new content for the channel  and attracting new people. Those people in turn will cause the channel views to go up, looping back to where we started, advertisements.
Let's do another example: Mainstream games have thousands of sales, which in turn leads to the company recovering the money they spend on the project and then getting some extra to support them in their development efforts. I should also point out that in some cases the community pays for the project to become real, so that involves less spending on the company's part and also allows the company to get a greater return over all.
Now let me ask you this, Chris. Can audiogame developers do the same? Can they rely on their audiogame to sell enough to cover their living costs until they release something new? I think we just answered your question.
By all means, Chris, proove me wrong. Make something that will support you until you release something else that will do the same for the audiogame market. If you can do that, let me know.

Hi Arron,
Well what Jason said on the group was that if you created a driftwood account, the game is now free, as your account is upgraded to allow activation.