@arjan: From the documentation:

@arjan: OK, I have found one of them:

This also shows that converting buildings is a significant part of the game. (By the way, I have to say that my role here is just to make sure that the Python code allows what the designers want to do, not to tell them what to do.)

Sharing tech upgrades is not that difficult to code. The simplest way might be to do the sharing at the end of every turn. While this is not the most efficient way it doesn't matter because the computer would have very few things to do. And the code would be simple and sturdy. So actually I can add this quickly. I'll try to avoid adding a "can_use_upgrades_from_allies" variable for the moment and allow this by default.

This mod is awesome! It has encouraged me to play SoundRTS again. I kept following topics concerning the game, and updated it if a new version was available, but I haven't really played it in the last time. You've done amazing work Pragma by creating this mod! Thanks for that.

Here is the link for the German translation I've made for the CrazyMod. You're welcome to include it in the next version of the mod Pragma.

Finally, I've got some bugs for SoundMUD regarding the game SoundRTS itself:

1. If you minimize the game while you're in a match, after alt+tabbing back to the game, you aren't able to control any units or buildings anymore. You have to open the game menu and press escape to restore the ability of controlling your units or buildings.

2. It is not possible to have braille output on SoundRTS, when using NVDA. While the game is opened, the braille display reads "Unknown". The speech works fine; JAWS isn't supported at all.

hello,
Just wow, this mod actually made me go back to playing sound rts. Nice work, guys. So I noticed the webpage doesn't have a Spanish translation. Would you be interested in having one? I could translate both the webpage and the documentation if needed.

Is there anything I need to do to do that? Do I just kind of copy the website and translate it and send it over?

Well, my large ppost was been ignored t-t.

@soundmud:

The latest development version is at:

this version have a tag in the repository?
Or isn't marked as a new alpha update.

about the sharing of upgrades. Well is a good idea, but at same time, isn't a good idea. It provides advantages on teams that uses same races. One can dedicate to obtain rapidly the best upgrades, and the other, can mass units.

Well, I set up a fork of soundrts repository at:
https://github.com/sanslash332/soundrts
With a branch named Crazy, including the current mod in version 8.2
Is basically for provide a easy method to download and setup the game with the mod, in a remote machine  to host a game server including the mod in a few steps.

I tried to make this in the official soundrts repository, but I don't have write permissions... And is obvious that I  don't have these permissions xD

Well, when the mod updates to the 8.3 release, I'll update the repo.

Would the ability to teleport ally units and load ally units into your transports also be easy enough to implement? I think that could be interesting

my guess is that there was an inaccuracy in the AI directions that the crazy mod developers wrote, not a bug in the game. I know that the normal non-crazy mod default AI instructions had a hole in them that could cause the AI to stop recruiting units too. I created a custom AI file that never stopped recruiting things if it had the resources for my own personal use though

I can't promise which feature or bug fix will be done next.

@sanslash332:

This version is just the development version. I'll tag it when I release the next alpha version. More changes have to be done before. At the moment, the recent commits are either simple changes, or bug fixes, or private branches rebased and squashed into one commit.

Your large post wasn't ignored. I just need more thinking before implementing custom flags.

If the practice shows that sharing upgrades is a bad idea, I'll remove it from the code or add a variable to activate or remove it.

@the blasting gd:

Which version of Jaws are you using? Maybe I'll add accessible_output to the output methods.

@zakc93:

Allowing allied transports would be a bit tricky, while teleportation would be simpler. But all those simple additions make the code more and more complex, especially since the code is not always perfectly structured.

@soundmud:

This version is just the development version. I'll tag it when I release the next alpha version. More changes have to be done before. At the moment, the
recent commits are either simple changes, or bug fixes, or private branches rebased and squashed into one commit.

perfect, thanks for the answer :3

@:

If the practice shows that sharing upgrades is a bad idea, I'll remove it from the code or add a variable to activate or remove it.

well, it's that only need is a  period of testing. The testing in allied battles says if the shared upgrades are a good feature.

@:

Which version of Jaws are you using? Maybe I'll add accessible_output to the output methods.

what is exactly the accessible_output that you are thinking?
A window that its elements are readable using screen readers, or a kind of text box (readable by the jaws) in that you put all of the output of the game?
Currently, NVDA works better than jaws during a game. The capturing method of keys of jaws trap the arrows keys, making the press of it very laggy.
Can you put in the game some hook interrupt  for the keys, to destroy the detect keys of the jaws?
I try it with j13 an 14. I know one game that uses a hook install over the jaws, to can use without jaws interrupt the keys, without close the jaws.
Adventure at c:

@:

Allowing allied transports would be a bit tricky, while teleportation would be simpler. But all those simple additions make the code more and more complex,
especially since the code is not always perfectly structured.

hmmm before add all of this features, is good option work in to structure the code.

Thanks for all :3

Hi,
Congratulations for the crazy mod! I love it, but I also love the original one, so please don't remove it.
Another thing:

The easy AI seems fine (I don't understand

goto -1

though). However, in the aggresive AI:

label rush
get 9 peasant 5 footman 8 knight
attack

No goto statement under this.
This may be a bugg, not sure though.

@Pragma: can you take a look at technical? I think that anti-air batteries might be overpowered, given that they can do 8.32 damage (after upgrades) per second with a damage radius of 1 metre. Maybe its rate of fire could be reduced to once every 1.5 instead of 1 second? The damage radius of bombers might be too high as well at 4 metres, and should be reduced.
Grenade launchers are also really overpowered, because they can do 13.32 damage every 4 seconds after upgrades with a damage radius of 2 metres. Technicals are supposed to have a weakness, but right now, there's not really a lot of strategy required to play them properly because of their insane offensive capabilities, spying airships being easy to make, hospitals, and upgrades. If you have grenade launchers and a few anti-air batteries, you essentially get the offensive power of robots without the massive resource and time cost, with hospitals making the grenade launchers really hard to take down.